Probably because I grew up during "the era", and was continually trying to coax more performance out of a given car.
Purposely un matching numbers for convenience and performance!!
My excitement was hiding enhancements so the car/Engine had a factory look but performed better.
No extra chrome, do dads, billet, colored wires or hoses for me!!!
Did you know you are 103 years old on this site?
I'm with you. When someone looks under my hood, I don't want a bunch of, "Hey, Look at me!"
stuff under there. I would rather leave them guessing if really is modified, or stock.
My 1986 Dodge Omni Turbo looks stock but is running over 300 H.P.
No, I do agree with your point of view, I have a beautiful 68 Chevelle SS clone, had a 67 442 clone. What I found out was regular Chevelle 2 door severe project cars are going for nearly the same price as a severe condition SS projects and as you are buying parts the cost and labor is vertically the same for both. However, a clone goes for 1/4 to half of the real deal and costs the same to insure. Bang for the buck I'd have to go with an investment grade final product or buy a completely finished clone for cheap money.Richard, I totally get your point and don't mean to be argumentative.
Original cars are treasures for sure but so are others, that's why I find the "Newman" image funny.
For some, restoring a car and hunting down every correct part is fun, for me, not so much.
As you bring up clones, even they can have a place as they can be driven and enjoyed.
A COPO Chevelle for example has its place, but can be duplicated, and enjoyed with much less worry and expense.
There are at least 3 sides to every coin!!!
Thanks
Randy