ballancing the components

grumpyvette

Administrator
Staff member
Ok you've decided to buy/build a 383 from parts you've collected from that 350 in your car, you've got the parts an your itching to start assembly....should you take the time to balance the parts or just slap it together....
first I'd point out that even the supposedly factory balanced rotating assembly's are seldom correctly balanced to within at least 1 gram, and the UN-balanced kits are generally measurably worse but keep in mind if you want it done correctly you'll usually require a re-balancing and THAT can generally add $130-$200 plus to the cost (money well spent if the works done correctly)
balancing/clearancing the rotating assembly will effectively reduce the stress on the components, the amount that stress will be reduced depends on how far off the components are from the originals the crank,damper and flex plate or flywheel were designed for , now I think balancing the new assembly's a NO BRAINER as its usually under $200 and even if it reduced the stress only 15% its a big improvement, but the truth here is that without re-balancing you've more than likely got zero idea how far off the new parts are and you might be assembling a combo that will shake itself to pieces in 10K......Id suggest spending the $200 and getting it done correctly.A crank with just 2 ounce-inches of imbalance sees 14.2 lbs of force at 2,000 RPM. That means each time the piston changes direction, a 14 lb hammer is knocking on the bearings (and subsequently the crank). Speed it up to 4,000 RPM, and that force climbs to 56.8 lbs, at 8,000 RPM, you have 227.2 lbs smacking each bearing, twice per revolution. When an engine is in balance, these heavy forces are countered by the counter weights of the crank shaft. To add a little extra insurance, the main caps and rod bolts were provided by ARP.
Engine Balance: Internal vs. External
An engine must be balanced to ensure smooth operation. It minimizes vibration and maximizes engine life. Balancing can be internal, external, or a combination of both.

Balancing an engine means offsetting the weight of the pistons and rods. This involves adding or removing weight from the crankshaft. The Harmonic Balancer and/or the flexplate or flywheel can also be weighted.

Internal Balance
An internally balanced engine has all the counterweight on the crank. External parts like the balancer and flexplate/flywheel have a neutral balance. They will not affect the other rotating parts.

External Balance
If the crank's counterweights are too light, the engine must be externally balanced. This involves adding weight to the harmonic balancer and/or the flexplate or flywheel.

How does it affect performance?
Generally speaking, internal balance is the better option. External counterweights can cause the crankshaft to flex at high rpm. This can cause engine damage. However, either type of balance is fine for most engines.

Converting from external to internal balance can be expensive. It requires a new crankshaft, harmonic balancer, and/or flywheel or flexplate. You may also need to clearance the block for the larger counterweights. Unless you're racing, it's easiest to balance the engine the same way the factory did.

Engine Type Factory Balance Method
Chevy 305/350 (2-piece rear main seal) Internal
Chevy 396-427 Big Blocks
Chevy LS Engines
Ford Modular Engines
Chevy 400/454 External
Ford 302/351W
Chevy 350 (1-piece rear main seal, including LT1) Combination of Internal & External


Notes
Balanced Rotating Assemblies come pre-balanced from the manufacturer. These can be installed without taking the parts to the machine shop.

If you buy an Unbalanced Rotating Kit, you will need to have it balanced before it's installed. The same is true if you buy a crankshaft, connecting rods, and pistons separately.

Crankshafts are listed as internal or external balance. This doesn't mean it's already balanced. It just tells you how it's intended to be balanced. It must be checked with the specific piston and rod combination you use.

READ THIS LINKED THREAD
viewtopic.php?f=38&t=3900&p=28672&hilit=balancing#p28672

http://www.maintenanceresources.com/ref ... alance.htm

http://www.circletrack.com/enginetech/c ... rminology/

viewtopic.php?f=53&t=343&p=1170&hilit=redline#p1170

yeah! we all know guys that skip the balance work and run engines, we all also know guys that have constant freak engine and drive train breakage and tuning, and oil control issues/ problems, with their cars and can,t seem to locate the source.
you can spend $150-200 in most cases up front to prevent problems or a take a chance on spending a good deal more once they occur, your choice!
and Id figure the chances are about like playing Russian roulette with two or three cylinders loaded in your revolver.

the next question that comes up,
("can I re-use my 350 damper and flexplate or flywheel ?")
brokenflexplate.jpg

OEM flex plates are far thinner and more flexible than the SFI certified flex-plates , so they are far more likely to crack and split over time, sometimes a small crack can make a constant banging noise thats hard to isolate , other times it rapidly causes a failure that fairly easy to locate :mrgreen: :roll:

bustedflex.jpg



sum-g100sfi_cp.jpg






that depends on several factors, 3.75" stroke cranks come in BOTH internally balanced and EXTERNALLY BALANCED designs, the 400 crank cut down to use in a 350 block is externally balanced and requires in most cases a 400 damper and flex-plate or flywheel, if the cranks designed for an EXTERNALLY balanced flex-plate and damper like a 400 has ,you CAN get it RE-balanced for a INTERNALLY balanced flex-plate and damper like a 350, so that you can use internally balanced components like a 350 damper and flywheel/flex-plate... but the cost is frequently higher than just buying a new crank of the correct design, generally your stuck using the type of balance the cranks originally designed for due to counter weight size, placement and cost issues, as welding in extra mallory metal weights gets expensive fast, and forged 3.75" SBC internally balanced cranks are not all that expensive. theres also the option of installing counter weights on the 350 components to use with the 400 crank, if you choose to go that route

ses-3-60-11-026.jpg



http://www.scatcrankshafts.com/

external.jpg

externally balanced assembly's have counter weights on the flex-plate and damper


theres a DIFFERENCE between CAN, you physically do something and CAN you do it at a reasonable cost!
I know of no-one that will take the time and effort and go thru the expense to modify a 400 crank to run 350 components because an INTERNALLY ballanced 3.75" stroke crank that's designed to run those 350 components is fairly cheap and easily obtainable, but a decent shop can weld up counter weights and add enough mallory metal to rebalanced almost any crank to internally balance it

The Chevy v8 flywheel or flex-plate usually has seven holes in it. 6 for bolts and one for a location dowel pin, which can be missing, on some cranks.
on the mount flange in the back of the crankshaft, so the flywheel will bolt on 6 different ways if the dowel pin is missing as the bolt hole spacing is the same. Check to be sure the dowel pin hole in flywheel is aligned with the dowel hole in the crankshaft flange, if the pins missing, or its will unbalance the assembly.


Ive always suggested buying a complete balanced rotating assembly from a single name brand source like LUNATI , CROWER, SCAT,OLIVER,EAGLE, HERBERT PERFORMANCE,OHIO CRANK, or several other sources, but even supposedly factory balanced assemblies need to be checked as Ive seen some (SUPPOSEDLY BALANCED) assembly's that were obviously just matched weight components

precision balance jobs generally try to get the engine to be balance to within a 1/2--1 gram tolerance, naturally the more time it takes, and the more precise the work, the more it tends to cost
the only way your going to get a precise balance job is to have all the components weights and balance known and all the components matched in individual weight, first balanced individually, as each connecting rod big and small end weight needs to match, and each piston needs to match, then have all the bob weights on the crank match the weight the piston & rods weight as a complete assembly, the crank with its flywheel or flex- plate and damper need to be balanced as a rotating assembly

What is Balancing?
Balancing is the action of matching the weights of the reciprocating parts of the engine. These parts include, but are not limited to:
Pistons and Piston Pins
Piston Rings
Rod Bearings
Connecting Rods (large and small ends, need to be weight matched)
Crankshaft
Damper (harmonic balancer)
Flywheel/Flex Plate
Pressure Plate/Clutch (frequently over looked)
Also, an "Estimated" Weight of Oil is part of the calculations

bobweight.jpg

once you get the assembly balanced ask for the SPECS so any future replacement parts can be easily matched
example if your piston weights 589 grams you need to know that.
once balanced your clutch pressure plate should have a obvious index mark that matches the identical mark on the flywheel so the two components are always assembled together the same way as a unit. SOME SHOPS stamp a BL some shops JUST drill or punch a small DOT, on both the pressure plate and flywheel ,so be aware and look for and match components indexed correctly, and MENTION that you WANT the pressure plate balanced with the flywheel, theres a good chance that if you don,t mention and insist on getting it done that its ignored and this can be a source of vibration if not done(one more reason to get a good SFI rated blow proof pressure plate and BILLET fly wheel, and use a LAKEWOOD blow proof bell housing)



read thru these links

viewtopic.php?f=53&t=259&p=314#p314



you obviously need a correctly installed bell housing that correctly centers the transmission input shaft with the crank center-line or that can cause problems

viewtopic.php?f=71&t=584&p=757&hilit=lakewood#p757

viewtopic.php?f=71&t=2596&p=6689&hilit=+pilot+grease#p6689
 
Last edited by a moderator:
will this help?
the first thing Id suggest is pitching any stock 3/8" factory connecting rods in the nearest dumpster, as even if correctly reworked with new ARP rod bolts as they will be less than 60% as strong as the better 4340 forged SCAT connecting rods with the 7/16" rod bolts and it will most likely cost more to recondition stock rods and add ARP rod bolts to old rods with millions of stress cycles already on them, so its a far better idea to go with the stronger and usually cheaper aftermarket SCAT rods in either 6" or 5.7' WITH 7/16" ARP rod bolts, before you balance & clearance and test assemble your rotating assembly
yes you can recondition stock connecting rods and yes theres a balance pad on both ends that gets belt sanded to match the lightest weight rod in the set on factory connecting rods, If you find you have one or more rods that won,t easily balance , the correct response is to find a new rod that you can match to the existing set without needing to belt sand one excessively
yes you can sand off some weight without excessively weakening the rods lower end in most cases but its a gamble that could cost you the whole engine and block so your better off buying and matching a new connecting rod.
and when it comes down to brass tacks as they say your almost always ahead buying a set of factory balanced forged 4340 rods like scat sells that are up to twice as strong as factory pink rods
the SCAT rods come in 5.7" and 6" versions with 7/16" ARP rod bolts
157192.jpg


most machine shops charge more to recondition stock connecting rods and install new ARP rod bolts than these linked [color:red](BELOW)[/color]connecting rods or similar high quality mid priced SCAT rods cost
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/SCA-26000716/

http://www.scatcrankshafts.com/product-search/

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sca-25700716/overview/
READ THESE THREAD's
and don,t skip the sub linked info

http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/engine-balancing.3900/

http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/engine-balancing.3900/#post-57940

http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/redline.343/

http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/types-of-crankshaft-steel.204/

http://garage.grumpysperformance.co...s-to-casting-numbers-and-info.632/#post-53467




sca-25700_w.jpg

a far stronger than factory connecting rod
http://www.scatcrankshafts.com/product-search/

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sca-6570020

sure the earlier smaller journal bore size is listed, as is the others (larger later journal)
so read carefully before ordering parts

for those of you un-aware of rod journal sizes


Chevy Smallblock V8 Crankshaft Journal Sizes


Gen.I, "Small Journal"

265...Mains-2.30"-Rods-2.00"
283...Mains-2.30"-Rods-2.00"
302...Mains-2.30"-Rods-2.00"
327...Mains-2.30"-Rods-2.00"


Gen.I, "Medium Journal", includes "Vortec" 305 and 350 thru '98
262...Mains-2.45"-Rods-2.10"
267...Mains-2.45"-Rods-2.10"
302...Mains-2.45"-Rods-2.10"
305...Mains-2.45"-Rods-2.10"
307...Mains-2.45"-Rods-2.10"
327...Mains-2.45"-Rods-2.10"
350...Mains-2.45"-Rods-2.10"


Gen.I, "Large Journal"
400...Mains-2.65"-rods-2.10"


Non-production Gen.I combination, using Gen.I 400 crank in Gen.I 350 block
383...400 crank, Mains cut to 2.45"-Rods-2.10"


Non-production Gen.I combination, using Gen.I 350 crank in Gen.I 400 block
377..."Spacer" or "thick" main bearings with 350 crank-Rods-2.10"


Gen.II, "Medium Journal", includes "L-99" 265, "LT-1" 350, "LT-4" 350
265...Mains-2.45"-rods-2.10"
305...Mains-2.45"-Rods-2.10"
350...Mains-2.45"-Rods-2.10"


Non-production Gen.II combination, using Gen.II 265 "L-99" crank in Gen.II 350 block
302...Mains-2.45"-Rods-2.10"


Gen.III, includes '97-2005 "LS-1" Corvette, Firebird, Camaro
345...Mains-2.558"-Rods-2.10"


Corvette "ZR-1", DOHC, "LT-5"
350...Mains-2.76"-Rods-2.10"

http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/rod-bolts-rpm-vs-stress.341/

http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/connecting-rod-weights.3540/

http://garage.grumpysperformance.co...ing-rod-strength-h-vs-i-beam.1168/#post-29973

http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/ballancing-the-components.141/
IT will if you take the effort to read thru the linked INFO

http://victorylibrary.com/mopar/crank-bal-c.htm

http://www.circletrack.com/techarticles ... index.html

http://www.centuryperformance.com/engin ... g-145.html

http://victorylibrary.com/mopar/crank-bal-c.htm

http://www.centuryperformance.com/engine-balancing-for-life-power-amp-efficiency-spg-145.html

http://www.torquecars.com/tuning/engine-balancing.php

http://www.eddiesvalvegrinding.com/balancing.htm

http://www.completeautorepair.net/engine_balancing.htm

http://www.carcraft.com/howto/ccrp_0803_engine_balancing/index.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2008 ... /index.php

http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2003/09/stroker/

worth reading thru


you can build an internal or externally ballanced engine, just because the stock 400 and 454 chevys are externally ballanced in no way prevents you from building a 383,396, 406 sbc or 454,496,540,572 BBC thats INTERNALLY BALLANCED, its just generally more expensive to do so.
Ive found that buying complete ballanced rotating assemblies from a single source is usually the best route, you can get either internal or externally ballanced assemblies, it helps a great deal to use light weight tool steel piston pins, pistons and (h) rods to lower the rotating/reciprocating weight, if you want to internally ballance the assembly.

parts sources

PHONE: 310-370-5501

http://www.scatcrankshafts.com/

http://www.adperformance.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=71_231&products_id=669

http://www.dougherbert.com/

call and ask if they have a complete ballanced assembly available
if your not sure of how an engine was assembled or the components or clearances that were used your choices are, run it as it arrived and pray.....or take the time to disassemble and verify everything in the assembly is as it should be.
most 400 sbc engine use a externally ballanced assembly, simply because that cheaper to produce and it costs less, but you can certainly build an internally ballanced 383-400-406 sbc or 454,496,540,572 BBC thats INTERNALLY BALLANCED, its just generally more expensive to do so.
from easily available components, yet its usually the best route as the internal engine stress levels, and harmonics induced in the rotating assembly, in the upper rpm ranges tends to be lower
 
no you can,t guess or just assume its correct, you'll need both matched components and the local balance shops tender care here if you want the engine to run smoothly unless you buy a factory matched set of components OR buy an aftermarket rotating assembly that comes as a balanced assembly.
BUT a word of caution, some of the so-called BALANCED assemblies are BARELY in specs and really need to be carefully rebalanced, ask for the component weights and if it was balanced to a 1,2,3 or gram tolerance, naturally the closer the better.

INTERNALLY BALANCED ASSEMBLIES induce LESS STRESS on the rotating components because EACH counterweight on the crank counter balances the components near it, EXTERNAL BALANCING takes into account the total imbalance of ALL the components along the cranks length, and adds enough weight to make the AVERAGE of all those combined IMBALANCE CONDITIONS CORRECT

just as a concept,you might want to think of it like having a long section of chain, that you want to keep stretched tight, and not allow to twist,or bounce around, you can either put one large bungee cord on each end (EXTERNALLY BALANCED)

or you can put two smaller bungee cords on the ends and 3 smaller ones on the 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 length points along its length, (INTERNALLY BALANCED)

BOTH ARE FAIRLY STABLE but the difference is in the movement the central section sees, and the more movement and the more stress the metal in the crankshaft and the block holding it needs to absorb.
while that's hardly exactly whats going on the basic concept might help you visualize the difference.

IF that doesn,t help try this,
get out a strand of SPAGHETTI and draw a line along one edge with a black marker, now hold one end solid and twist the other end by spining in back and forth between you fingers, you'll see the line drawn start to spiral,(EXTERNAL BALANCE) then have a buddy hold the central area on the strand of SPAGHETTI in two places and repeat, the twisting , youll notice the deflection is greatly reduced, thats similar to what internal ballancing does with its larger counter weights.

9227171_n.jpg

OBVIOUSLY a machine shop doing balancing work on a rotating assembly's , and adding mallory metal slugs to counter weights,on the crank must do quality work or problems with durability usually result that get damn expensive or dangerous
sum-s01482_w.jpg

cmb-08-0002_w.jpg

http://store.summitracing.com/partdetai ... toview=sku
typical internally balanced components


typical externally balanced components below, notice the weight on the lower right area.
sum-g101sfi_w.jpg

ati-917741e_w.jpg


flu-800141_w.jpg

theres also weights available to change internally ballanced components to external should you want to go that route
ses-3-60-11-026.jpg


ITS ALMOST ALWAYS A BETTER IDEA to buy a matched balanced kit with all components supplied from a single source
heres a few IVE used with good results


http://www.ohiocrank.com/rotatepage1.html

http://www.dougherbert.com/enginecompon ... 5f1f37f9e5

http://www.adperformance.com/index.php? ... ath=71_231
an EXTERNALLY balanced damper

blancer.jpg

its REQUIRED to be used with a MATCHING crank and counter weighted FLEX PLATE or FLYWHEEL

INTERNALLY BALANCED (SCAT, or LUNATI, or CROWER) 4340 steel FORGED KITS WITH 7/16" ARP rod bolts and clevite (H) bearings, and forged pistons are preferred in most cases, the scat 9000 cast steel cranks work ok for mild performance applications but INSIST on 7/16" ARP ROD BOLT RODS and ID strongly suggest INTERNAL BALANCING
 
forged components are generally stronger
(IE will take abuse longer and at greater stress levels) and forged pistons are slightly more heat resistant than hypereutectic or cast
as a general rule if your going to exceed 100hp shot of nitrous or have the rotating assembly spin at near 4000 feet per minute in piston speed forged components tend to be a good investment


http://www.jegs.com/p/ATI/ATI-Super-Dam ... 7/10002/-1
MOST NASCAR TEAMS USE ATI DAMPERS AND THEY CERTAINLY HAVE THE TEST DATA TO SUPPORT THE CHOICE

viewtopic.php?f=53&t=110&hilit=4032

viewtopic.php?f=53&t=343&p=1170&hilit=redline#p1170

viewtopic.php?f=53&t=204&p=239#p239

viewtopic.php?f=53&t=978&p=9053&hilit=wrist+piston#p9053

http://www.centuryperformance.com/engin ... g-145.html

http://www.ghbalancer.com/techinfo/norm ... ion%27.htm

http://www.enginebuildermag.com/Article ... rofit.aspx

WATCH VIDEO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UNLrXUL49w

a reasonable limit on cast pistons usually falls near 4000 feet per minute in piston speeds
so your stroke is a factor not just rpms

http://www.csgnetwork.com/pistonspeedcalc.html

a balanced set of quality forged pistons can probably handle 4500fpm, or a bit more

If your thinking of interchanging components on a sbc, you'll need to know what your dealing with, I.E. internal or external balanced rotating assemblies, many 383 cranks are externally balanced ,meaning both the flex plate or flywheel and balancer are matched sets , with offset counter weights to compensate for a crank thats got smaller than ideal conter weights on its throws ,balancing the crank as it flex's,while almost all 350 cranks are internally balanced making interchanging the dampers a major problem, yes there are internally balanced 383 rotating assemblies and if you have one then theres a good chance the balancer could be used or an aftermarket balance weight can be added to a internally balanced assembly but it requires re-balancing to get it dead on correct and usually costs more than buying the correct damper to begin with

http://forum.grumpysperformance.com/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=562

http://forum.grumpysperformance.com/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=279
 
use of lighter weight components reduces inertia, and resulting stress but taken too far it reduces strength of the components past the point where it is worth doing.
if your going to build a combo to run pump octane fuel that spends 90% of its time under 5500rpm and run a flat tappet cam, and an intake and heads designed for mid rpm torque, its rather pointless,
I don,t think theres a great deal gained on any street/strip application selecting light weight components past the point of selecting good quality forged components,
as an example,
like rods with the longest easily used length with 7/16" ARP L19 rod bolts
and 4340 forged steel cranks
and decent forged pistons with light weight piston pins,
remember its the total combo, its senseless to worry about grams in a piston when your trying to haul hundreds of extra pounds in a street car, in a 9:1-10:1 cpr engine thats geared mostly for decent mileage that gets to spend 90% plus of its life at under 5500rpm,now if your building a dragster thats going to spin 8700rpm thru the lights, and weight under 2100lbs running 13.7:1 compression and a solid roller cam and launch off the line at 5000plus rpm,then hit the nitrous, so it spends 90% of its time between 5000rpm and 7000 PLUS rpm,thats a totally different deal

one fairly common questions I get is about if swapping from a 35lb steel flywheel to a lighter 20lb aluminum flywheel, will help the acceleration in a 3500 lb muscle car used on the street,(IT WON,T), think about it, yes if you rev the engine in neutral it will spin up a bit quicker, but your NEVER in neutral when applying power to the rear wheels, and while the engines trying to accelerate 3500 lbs, the inertia of a 35 lb steel flywheel tends to retain energy, smooth shifts and store energy thats used in launching the car, while an aluminum flywheel might allow the car to accelerate marginally faster the trade off is seldom in the lighter flywheels favor once the et is compared.
now put that same flywheel swap into a 2300 lb circle track car that shifts constantly coming into and out of corners, and uses the engine compression to brake the car coming into corners on a short track,and blasts out of those corners at full throttle, and then yes the aluminum flywheel and light weight rotating assembly has a purpose.

viewtopic.php?f=53&t=1168

viewtopic.php?f=53&t=510

viewtopic.php?f=53&t=343

viewtopic.php?f=53&t=1042


http://www.angelfire.com/ca4/CorvAIRCRA ... lance.html

http://www.angelfire.com/ca4/CorvAIRCRA ... ance2.html
 
Back
Top