Component Selection & Design for 500 HP Fuel System

that flare tools one of those tools you seldom use but is well worth the cost in less aggravation, doing the job correctly without having problems, and much better quality work when you do use it!, than you would get from the typical , cheap, and flimsy, auto parts store imported tool that never seems to work well, or be consistent.
you always debate the cost of tools like that because many times you can buy already flared tubing or have a local shop do the flares for you, but once you buy and use the tool you kick yourself for not purchasing it years ago!

http://www.amazon.com/Ti-Industries--Ca ... aulic+line

http://store.fedhillusa.com/britishgirl ... tings.aspx
 

Got the Rigid 37° flaring tool in yesterday and just had to try it, so I cut me a 6 inch
piece of 1/2 inch aluminum fuel line.

Line up the arrow with the index line, then you can tighten the clamp and it will be
located such that it fits the divot on the side.


Rigid377_Tool01_3505.jpg
Rigid377_Tool02_3503.jpg

Features
http://www.ridgid.com/Tools/458R-Ratche ... /index.htm

- This precision tool provides smooth, uniform flares with minimum effort.

- The new ratcheting feed screw handle turns easily and requires less motion and effort
than a standard handle.

- Hardened steel flaring cone, eccentrically mounted in needle bearings, produces
rolling action for even metal flow, giving uniform flare walls without galling.


Rigid377_Tool03_3506.jpg
Rigid377_Tool04_3508.jpg
Rigid377_Tool06_3514.jpg

This is the only problem I noticed in the short time that I used it.
Rigid377_Tool05_3512.jpg
Rigid377_37°_Flare_Tool_Pg01.jpg
Rigid377_37°_Flare_Tool_Pg02.jpg

Download the PDF file below:


 

Attachments

  • Rigid377_37°_Flare_Tool.pdf
    655.5 KB · Views: 13
Last edited:

When looking for a shutoff valve to go between the fuel tank and the 100 micron Pre-Filter
I found this 316 Stainless Steel Ball Valve on Amazon for $15. Will probably polish the outside
at some point. I also noticed that there are what's call a Mini-Valve, but upon further
inspection it had what's called a "Reduced Port", so beware that some ball valves for any
particular size can have a internal size that is less than the valve size which would restrict flow.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B006VC ... 02_s00_i00


ShutoffValveHalfInch01_3517.jpg
ShutoffValveHalfInch02_3519.jpg
ShutoffValveHalfInch03_3520.jpg

Typical Mini Ball Valve Configuration

MiniBallValve.jpg

 
Last edited:
grumpyvette said:
in all applications that reduction in cross sectional area MIGHT BE a problem but in this case I can,t see it being an issue

Well now you are confusing me!

All this time you kept recommending 1/2 inch line when I had some 3/8 inch already
installed, but now something less 1/2 inch is Ok. Could you explain why?

 
I don,t think it will be an issue because your earlier potential use of 3/8" fuel lines would have probably worked, it would just have been marginal, at the power levels you should expect, or might eventually reach with a few minor upgrades, now that the rest of the systems been upgraded to AN#8 or 1/2" . that single potential restrictions not as likely to cause issues, would upgrading the valve size to a true AN#8 be a good idea?, yes it would, but its also not likely to matter much at anything under 500-550 hp as thats usually the max you can reliably feed thru a 3/8" fuel line feeding a carburetor before the restriction to flow becomes a significant issue. keep in mind the same RATIO of restriction would generally happen if you had been using all 3/8" fuel lines and fittings so if you used 3/8" or AN#6 theres a strong chance that an internal fitting would have restricted flow to less than what a strait section of AN#6 would have provided, so by upgrading to AN#8 the internal fitting is far less restrictive, in your current fuel supply.
the use of AN#8 or 1/2" lines just removes any potential for the fuel system to prove to be a restriction to power to at least 700 hp, so any time Ive build a combo that MIGHT have the fuel lines become a restriction its a good idea to make sure its not going to be an issue.
remember I said that early in this thread.
fcd1.jpg

If your current fuel tank or fuel lines can,t keep up with the engines demands, can you remove the current plate and fittings and drill and soldier in a larger dual fuel fittings
fuelplate1.jpg

http://www.tanksinc.com/index.cfm/p...t_id=100/category_id=167/mode=prod/prd100.htm


Tankconnect1.jpg

http://www.jegs.com/c/Fuel-Carbs-Intakes_Fuel-Cells-Fuel-Tanks/10297/10002/-1

http://garage.grumpysperformance.co...es-restrict-fuel-flow-rates.12859/#post-66683

tankfity.png

FuelFlowDiagram02a1.jpg


http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/setting-up-your-fuel-system.211/

http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/how-big-a-fuel-pump-do-you-need.1939/

http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/fuel-pressure-regulators.635/

http://garage.grumpysperformance.co...ss-fuel-pressure-regulators.12776/#post-65958

http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/input-on-electric-fuel-pump-selection.10664/

http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/fuel-line-sizing-return-vs-feed.3067/

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/rci-2100ad

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/rci-2172a/overview/

http://fuelsafe.com/store/

http://garage.grumpysperformance.co...ks-and-welding-on-fuel-tanks.6178/#post-61230

http://fuelsafe.com/store/fuel-cells/complete-cells/complete-sportsman-fuel-cells.html

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/rci-2191a/overview/

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/rci-2200ab/overview/
RELATED INFO
https://www.summitracing.com/search/brand/ict-billet/department/fittings-hoses

http://www.smartfireinjectors.com/fuelflowchart.html

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=211&p=247#p247

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=1939

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=635

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=109

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=1200

VERY INTERESTING ADDITION TO THE POTENTIAL FUEL SYSTEM DESIGN
http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArticles/ ... rvoir.aspx

grumpyvette said:
while an engine like the one built here for the T-bucket can get by with AN#6 LINES (3/8") as your not likely to exceed the potential flow restriction limitations of that size fuel line, and you only need about 100 gph pump and about 6 psi, IVE ALWAYS PREFERRED THE LARGER AN#8 fuel line size and an ELECTRIC fuel pump that puts out a minimum of 140 gph mounted back as close too the fuel cell or fuel tank,and as low as possible and used with a return style regulator.
my current EFI 383 has a walpro 255 that provides 40 psi but uses 3/8" lines , and it will supply the required fuel to maintain about 500 hp.
keep in mind Im using an extensively ported stealth ram base with a custom plenum and throttle body and and 36 lb injectors on my 383 SBC
on my 496 BIG BLOCK I found the larger size fuel lines and larger pump with a fuel cell installed mandatory, as the smaller lines allowed the engine power to drop noticeably by the time I had reached the 100 ft from launch point, swapping to the larger fuel pump helped noticeably


viewtopic.php?f=55&t=1939&p=5137#p5137

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=211

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=4381

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=635

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=5731

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=733&p=6470&hilit=fuel+cell#p6470
 
Last edited by a moderator:
using a small ID for a short lenght is not as critical as using a full lenght fuel line of smaller ID. lenght also play a role... The longer the line is the bigger it has to be(i dont have it on hand but there was a calculator about flow restriction, it has to do with ID and lenght had a hudge effect). so for a short area like this valve(like 1 inch long?) it dont matter if its 1/8 smaller.

just like a 3/16 ID tubing has a 3psi restriction per foot(with maximum gph/flow)... so if its half a foot.. or 50 foot it make a hella difference.
 

I'm not going to go back and look, but based on my memory of this thread, you always seemed
to be recommending 1/2 inch lines. I understand now that you recommend 1/2 inch, but 3/8 inch
lines and fittings would work but not what you would prefer to see when given a choice.

Does that put it the right perspective?

 
i use 3/8 line with quality fittings and they are fine. i did only because i was too lazy to take the fuel tank off and weld some 1/2 bung. otherwise i would have went with 1/2.
Now if i want to upgrade and say use nitrous.. i dont think 3/8 will handle that.
 
mathd said:
i use 3/8 line with quality fittings and they are fine. i did only because i was too lazy to take the fuel tank off and weld some 1/2 bung. otherwise i would have went with 1/2.
Now if i want to upgrade and say use nitrous.. i dont think 3/8 will handle that.

I was having a case of the lazies about pulling the 3/8 inch line in the frame, I understand that feeling! :D

 
Check this out, another option for those converting to EFI from carb.

Edelbrock Universal Fuel Reservoir Kit (3605)
"This Universal Fuel Reservoir Kit is designed to provide the necessary high fuel pressure required for EFI applications in vehicles equipped with low pressure carbureted fuel systems. It's a complete self-contained system that can be installed under the hood of any vehicle easily. The unique design of this system allows it to deliver a constant fuel pressure of 60 psi, which is necessary to operate an EFI system and will not require a fuel return line. This kit is intended to be used with the existing factory fuel tank and low pressure pump. The kit includes the fuel reservoir tank with high pressure pump and regulator pre-installed, mounting bracket, hose, fittings and all of the necessary hardware for installation."

http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_new/mc/efi/estreet_intro.shtml At the bottom...
 

Attachments

  • 3605.jpg
    3605.jpg
    54.2 KB · Views: 141

While looking for something else, I ran across this at Grainger's. Looks to
be available at many industrial supplies, probably with better prices.

You can get from 3 to 10 outlets and outlets at 90° apart, so lots
of flexibility in it configurations. Mounting holes are already drilled.

http://www.zorotools.com/g/Aluminum%20M ... /00114046/

Manifold02.JPG Manifold01.JPG



There are these in aluminum and brass for only $7.81 and $10.71
with 3/8" Inlet & Outlet.

http://www.zorotools.com/g/3-Way%20Hose ... /00061014/

Manifold03.JPG Manifold04.JPG


Lots of possibilities here:

http://www.zorotools.com/s/?q=manifolds&1.x=0&1.y=0


 
Last edited:

I'm concerned about the time I have to get the TBucket running this summer. So
for now I'm going to keep the old fuel system up to the carburetor feed system.
If I get to drive for 3-4 weeks, I will be most excited!!!! I NEED to to see how the
new engine and transmission work, along with a multitude of other thing work.
Then I can plan my winter projects.

So the following is what I must do to mate the new system to the old system.
Everything up to the inlet to the dual feed lines for the Demon will be the old
system. I do fear the comments from Sir Master Grump!!!...I wonder if he
has my address ??????

I cut several length of 1/2" wood dowel rod to help me determine the length of
the 3/8" fuel line down to the AN Tee fittings. I finally settled on 2-1/2". The 3/8"
fuel line came from O'Reilys with the fitting already on, I just cut the line to get
their fittings off. Then I could put a 37° flare.

FP01_CarbFuelInlet01_4494.jpg

I was very surprised and happy how the 1/2" wood dowel worked, I could slide it
thru the Tee fittings with just a slight drag. Which meant that the Tee AN fittings
would stay in place without rotating while I did my work.

FP01_CarbFuelInlet02_4495.jpg

I figured out the two 3/8" lines to carb float bowel needed to be 2-1/2" long, flared
them with my Rigid flaring tool and connected them......then I could screw it all
together with the 1/2 wood dowel and measure the distance between the AN Tees.
This 1/2" line will be stainless steel so I can polish it to a chrome like shine.


FP01_CarbFuelInlet03_4500.jpg
FP01_CarbFuelInlet04_4502.jpg
FP01_CarbFuelInlet05_4509.jpg

If you are interested, this is the SS tubing I used. It is annealed to a B90 hardest,
I will be looking at this with ALOT of interest when I pressurize the the fuel system
the first time to see if I have any leaks. The SS should be much harder then the
aluminum AN fitting, so it will be harder to make a good seal.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004XN ... UTF8&psc=1


Part Number s0500028t316sal 6'

Material Type Stainless Steel 316L

Outside Diameter 1/2 inches

Outside Diameter Tolerance +/-.005 inches

Inside Diameter 0.444 inches

Length 72 inches

Wall Thickness 0.028 inches

Wall Thickness Tolerance +/- 0.0049 inches

Specification Met ASTM A213 and A269

Temper Annealed

Hardness B90 Max Annealed

Compatible Material Air, natural gas, oil water

Upper Temperature Range 1500 Degrees Fahrenheit

 
Last edited:
YOUR DOING A TOP QUALITY JOB, I doubt one in a hundred guys have done as well , I certainly don,t see it done as well very often
https://www.summitracing.com/search/brand/ict-billet/department/fittings-hoses
FP01_CarbFuelInlet02_4495A.jpg


FP01_CarbFuelInlet03a_4500.jpg

the longer those 3/8" feed connection lines are the more leverage they have on the seal, and vibration will tend to effect the durability, obviously check for linkage clearance or carb mounting issues, I,d also point out you should have about a foot of flexible AN#8 fuel line at some point between the fire wall and carb to isolate and prevent fuel line damage from engine movement and heat and cooling
flexf1.gif

flexf2.JPG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You will be Ok driving with the old 3/8 inch fuel line system Rick.
But likely will see a 2-3 psi drop in fuel pressure WOT in 3rd & 4th gear.
So don't race hard till you upgrade to 1/2 inch fuel line throughout .
 
grumpyvette said:
the longer those 3/8" feed connection lines are the more leverage they
have on the seal, and vibration will tend to effect the durability,
obviously check for linkage clearance or carb mounting issues

I see your point and will try to incorporate that into the system this winter.

This winter when I complete the fuel system, can the pressure regulator be
mounted to the engine and function properly? Wondering if the vibration
will have an effect on the regulator? I don't have fenders or any framework
in front of the engine to mount to.
 
you can easily fabricate or buy a bracket to mount the fuel pressure regulator on that bolts to the intake manifold mount bolts, or valve covers

fprm1.jpg


fprm2.jpg
 
A Straight Shot in Nutsack Grumpy.
Bam is on the Ground rolling around.
Donald Trump is Laughing Historically .

This Topic is Real important .
500 Hp many can afford present.
 
Getting back to my fuel system upgrade. I'm using wood, since it's much easier to make mistakes on a
soft material like wood. Now that I can see all the mistakes I made, it should be much easier to make
the correct one from steel. I did buy some 304 SS, but I don't have a drill press that will turn slow
enough on the bigger drills. I will probably just use some steel bar from Lowes.

I started with the bracket and location of the pressure regulator. I bought a tool 2 years ago and finally
have a situation to use it. I used it for only one hole, but where it really shines is precisely locating
multiple hole at one time. It would be impossible for the home shop to get all 5 holes located in a
bracket, but with this tool it should be NO problem.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00B4XP8NG/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&psc=1
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00B4XP9JE/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Sure enough it screwed together in perfect alignment without any coaxing and without some choice
words. There would have been no way to measure accurately, I would have had to make the 2 holes
bigger than needed to make it align.

FP01_BracketMockup01_00071.jpg
FP01_TTC-7-Piece-Transfer-Screw_00072.jpg
FP01_TTC-7-Piece-Transfer-Screw_00075.jpg
FP01_ToolMarks_00079.jpg
FP01_FinishedPressureBracket_00084.jpg
 
Back
Top