do you usually take a second shot

grumpyvette

Administrator
Staff member
do you routinely take a second shot if, your sure the first ones a good hit?
theres several ways of looking at this and from what I see in my group of elk hunting buddies the most common idea seems to be if its still standing keep shooting.
now I used to be a firm believer in that,Id shoot an elk and if it didn,t drop instantly Id shoot until it did,which usually only meant a second shot,rarely a third, but with the 30/06 slide action Remington I was using at that time it sounded like almost semi-auto burst fire, when I swapped to a 340 wby and later a 375 H&H or 35 whelen, I noticed far more elk acted stunned and just staggered around a bit before dropping, I was sure of my shot placement , by that time I learned to shoot only when I was sure and well into range,and I just waited, they always fell in a few seconds, and I've NEVER lost an Elk I shot doing that,and after about 5 years of hunting elk and dressing out several dozen ELK I saw the results,those bullets produced, and it became rather obvious to me at least that if your sure of your shot placement and the animals just standing or stumbling around its not likely to drop a great deal faster from a second bullet impact in nearly the same spot.
elk are large and at least with the rifles and bullets I use bullets tend to zip thru and exit but leave an impressive path of destruction thru internal organs , yet its not UN-common for an elk to stagger around for 15-45 seconds before collapsing, or making a mad dash for 20-40 ft before going nose first into the dirt.
yes most of the guys I hunt with still keep firing if the elks still standing and I can see that has some logic to it, no one wants to loose a wounded elk. but I don,t like throwing away a good deal of bloodshot meat or dressing out elk with a couple slugs up the butt and into the intestines either.


"BUT GRUMPY? how do you know the bullet didn,t fail to penetrate or zip thru without expanding?"



thats a reasonable question, but after using a 340wby loaded with 250 grain hornadys,and 35 whelen,loaded with 250 grain speers and 375H&H loaded with 270-300 grain hornadys for decades,as the most common rifles I hunt with, and loading similar ammo for others Ive never seen a properly placed bullet fail to destroy the vitals, now a few failed to exit, Ive seen bullets expand a bit more or less than I would consider ideal, but none failed to deliver a mortal wound
in fact I have seen friends use 250 sierras in 338 wins that turned to glitter on impact that still delivered an almost instant mortal wound, its been my experience that most (BULLET FAILURES) were actually BAD SHOT PLACEMENT
maybe Ive just been extremely lucky but I can,t remember an elk running more than about 40 yard max before dropping when hit correctly and most never make it 20 feet



Those 250 gr. sierra gamekings in the 338 win mag work great on Elk. Most guys I know around here use them because they are damn accurate and "hit hard", usually producing DRT's when hit well. [/quote]

several guys in my camp have also found them to be accurate and very effective, they hammer elk on heart/lung shots and quick kills are frequent, but I also see those bullets expend rather rapidly, most of the time, some guys love them, me, not so much, I want exit wounds from nearly any angle personally, hey! everyone gets to select what they want to use my choices may not be ideal for you.
my late main hunting partner used mostly a 250 grain speer in a 358 win BLR and thought that was the absoluter best elk rifle ever made, he never had a problem killing elk, it worked for him,there one old guy in our camp that uses a 257 roberts and that works for him, so its rather obvious that its the guy using the equipment that dictates its effectiveness to a great extent, me, I like to get in close and hammer them, with at least 250 grain bullets ,I rarely take or even see elk past 250 yards but my methods may not suit everyone, but I prefer hunting areas like this,
deepcreek.JPG

actual picture of part of the area I hunt most of the last 35 years
 
I don't hunt elk. There aren't any where I live. Hopefully I will someday though as I have a friend who has invited me several times. I do however hunt whitetail deer.

To answer your question, no, I have never had to take a second shot.

I should let it go at that but I want to add my .02 as you and I disagree on one basic princible. That being you prefer for the bullet to exit and I don't. No big deal, we each accomplish what we want. I was taught early on and have read repeatedly over the years that a large, heavy, and slow moving bullet will do more damage than one that is lightweight and fast. The heavier bullet is good for causing a large cavity inside the body and also for its shock value. That shock will damage nearby organs far more so than a light weight bullet that passes through the body. I do however understand the bleeding on both sides theory.

To each his own.

Most of the deer I have shot did as you described with elk. They either stood for a few seconds and then collapsed or they ran for 30-40 yards and collapsed. I have also been taught, and watching friends has led me to believe, that a second shot will often cause the deer to run further leading to some possibly serious tracking. One well placed shot and the deer will wander off a short distance where he will turn to look to see where the sound came from. Whether thats why he stopped or not no one will ever really know but I have never had to go beyond 40 yards to find my deer. what I do is to wait 20-30 minutes after he has been shot before I go looking for him. This gives him time to bleed out.

As far as calibers go, it does go beyond a personal preference. No doubt some are better than others. Again, I prefer a larger heavier and slower moving bullet. My weapon of choice would be one of my 58 cal reproduction civil war muskets even on elk or moose. During the regular season I hunt with my sks. Now I have opened a can of worms. Many people hate that weapon for whatever reason but in 22 years I have never lost a deer with it and all have been single shot kills, including one at 400 yards using open sights.
 
I've never hunted Elk. So I speak from hunting white tail here in Michigan. The woods can be real thick, and at times just getting enough of a sight picture can be a real challenge.
My rule is, if you can see it, gain a sight picture...shoot!
I've taken running shots with little success. But at least I tried for it.

The above condition has led me to searching for what I feel is the idea gun here. Light, short barrel, fast sights and option of second shot.
 
That would be true here in southern Mississippi and southern Louisiana, that being heavy brush or thick timber. They tell me most shots are at less than 40 yards but most of mine have been above 80 yards. A good short barreled weapon is the best bet, unless you are in a comfortable deer stand. This is one reason why I like my sks. A 30-30 is also a good weapon in these conditions.

I have a good friend, a New York yankee, who hunts locally here only with a 12 ga. shotgun and deer slugs. he is also the friend who invites me out west for elk and moose hunts. I believe he uses a 270 for those hunts.
 
Learning to hunt thick brush and timber was an adventure itself. I had heard/read for years that shooting through thick brush was a no-no as the bullet would be deflected/defeated when striking smaller obstructions. Especially with the blunt nose 30-30 round.
Further experience and finally setting up my own target experiment showed just the opposite. All but the heaviest obstructions were sheared off with the bullet continuing with good accuracy on the targets. This was with multiple calibers and bullet designs.
This in turn increased my success rate in the field, as my mental set had me shooting through anything but tree trunks.
The last decade brought even further advancement with the 'spire pointed' 30-30 & other former blunt nose rounds. With this came a generous range increase.
I still take several guns to choose from to the hunt in multiple calibers. It satisfies my desires to change with conditions and landscape.
But I still choose to have a quick second shot option. So the bolt actions stay home these days and the lever and S/A's go huntin.
 
Some years back I shot a wild hog in the chest by shooting through a tree that was about 12-14" in diameter. The hog was peaking around looking at me. I guess he thought he was well hidden. Not quite hidden enough

One shot. One kill. 300 yards. SKS, open sights. ;)
 
Back
Top