just want some reassurance on combo choices

Edelbrock claims as long as it's 10" I would be ok. I'm a little skeptical and would like to see more. Especially factoring in engine wear. But maybe they have it figured out. I downloaded their app and looked at the tuner, they have a good bit of options for tweaks to it to get it correctly set. It's self learning also
 
Edelbrock claims as long as it's 10" I would be ok. I'm a little skeptical and would like to see more. Especially factoring in engine wear. But maybe they have it figured out. I downloaded their app and looked at the tuner, they have a good bit of options for tweaks to it to get it correctly set. It's self learning also
Only safe way is too look at catalog recommend EFI Cam profiles.

Modern EFI Guys that want more power use Turbocharging.
 
So it's the OEM ECM that cannot cope with a variable vacuum? It's not about performance, you just
need an aftermarket EFI like Edelbrock or FAST.
 
Chassis Dyno too.
3 EFI tuners.
I built the engines.
Head Tuner has a Texas mile car.
202 mph.
4 cylinder. The Flying EVO.
50 psi boost.
88mm turbo.
975 flywheel hp.
I built his engine last fall.
Yusef.
Knows his stuff.
Trusted me to build.
 
Gp8hvYG.png

MFfezDt.png


400 SBC Lunati 50156 Hydraulic Roller Cam.
1000 cfm throttle body.
Single Plane Intake.
Small Tube Headers open exhaust.
 
The Lunati 50156 makes more Hp than the Crower & Isky.

But it has alot more Overlap.
Calculates to 17 degrees at .050" lift.
Crower & Isky are at 5 degrees @.050".

Its deceiving how much cam overlap is there because we are used to Advertised Overlap talking about cams.
Lunati lists the 50156 as Rough idle when I looked it up.

I tried to find a conversion formula for .050" to Advertised cam overlap.
It does not exist.

Intake Centerline is 104.

Its a Max effort EFI cam for drag race to me.

Not one I would choose for your Camaro because goals changed to ease of driving and tuning with EFI Edelbrock Pro Flow.
 
Back
Top