long trip around - early tpi modder comes back to the fold.

joegagan

Well-Known Member
hi everybody.

thanks so much to grumpy for the great site. incredible resource, i appreciate every little thing you do here!

i am coming back around to my first SBC EFI project in over 15 years.

more on my current experiment in a new thread elsewhere at grumpy's.

just for giggles, here is part II of the 87 formula story i posted on the other thread.

after 3 years of daily driving/weekend bracket racing, coinciding with my new construction company 'taking off ' in terms of profit, i planned a buildup of my custom ordered, stripper 87 TPI/5spd formula firebird mentioned in the other thread.

picking up story, late 1991:

i pulled the Formula into my construction warehouse ( nice 1500 sq foot garage with high ceiling), tore it down to bare body/frame.

little did i know that it would be 18 months til the completion of the job.

i had access to a 4 bolt main block out of a 4X4 chevy pickup CIRCA 1974. i laid in a muddy field unbolting that engine from the hulk.

took it down to our local 'racer' engine shop. ( AMS in albuquerque, locals know doug and his great builds), i had them balance, blueprint and otherwise skillfully build the best 355(.030 over) bottom end possible, using the parts i brought them. the cast crank was lovingly deburred by yours truly before the motor build began.

i researched as many TPI articles as i could find in hot rod & car craft. ( other chevy, hot rod mags had not caught on to the EFI trend by '92). john lingenfelter had a breakthrough article in hot rod, late 80s/early 90s. he had taken the TPI setup to new extremes by porting, etc and was the first to get the hot rod magazine writers to get excited about TPI. by crossbreeding a 4 inch Porsche Mass Air Sensor ( vs the GM/bosch +-3.5")he had gotten a corvette running really respectable qtr. mile times while getting incredible day to day driveability.

SLP engineering was up and running at this point, but i was unimpressed with their customer service after my friend Dave Pike had received poor followup on a mfgr's faulty setup of their after market 3rd gen posi rearend.

i decided to use ( new at the time) Accel runners instead of the available TPIS larger runners or SLP tubing runners because the accel's were affordable at SUMMIT and were cast aluminum, instead of tubing. this allowed me to 1/2 siamese the runners, instead of the full siamese of Arizona speed and Marine's 'siamesed' runners ( large diameter tubing runners siamesed with sheetmetal), by going only halfway down the runner area by connecting the ports. my previous porting experience came in handy.

i used graph paper to chart out the torque/hp curves of all the published info ( scarce at that time) in modded TPI based setups. this got me the nickname of "mr' Charts and Graphs" with my racing buds, who normally only had their cars disassembled for no more than a month at time.

using the research, i decided that the torque curve of the stock TPI combined with the high RPM breathing of the prototype superram lingenfelter setup was the best of both worlds. i chose a cheapy summit brand cam ( made by crane hahA ) similar to lingenfleter's grind and brodix street alum. heads from summit. they had good flowing ports and only needed slight milling to achieve my important 10.5:1 compression ratio.
i carefully studied the cam indexing articles i could find, bought a degreeing wheel and indexed the cam perfectly to mfgr's specs using summit's adjustable timing gear set.

i ported the brodix heads nicely, and also gasket matched them carefully to the Mr.Gasket intake gaskets. from there, i ported every bit of the stock GM manifold base, until the aftermarket Edelbrock ports looked small by comparison. the GM plenum was ported, along with smoothing on the stock 52 mm throttle body. later, a simple air divider was added.

to be sure that the porting work was working to max effect, i trial assembled the TPI setup at least 8 times, using specially bent inspection wires and tiny scribe marks on each interface to perfectly gasket match every single component in the TPI intake setup. this was very time consuming, but critical in ensuring that every drop of airflow increase was being utilized. upon final assembly of the TPi setup, each scribe line was micro-aligned to ensure that the port matching was complete.

with the complexity of assembly that accompanies the stock TPI assembly, i don't see how anything less than the above method of assembly would assure maximum airflow results.

due to budget constraints, stock coil, distributor, fuel pump, injectors , t5 trans etc were used. total investment was under 20k including the purchase price of the car in 87.

i rebuilt the stock style water pump using summit's inexpensive 'low drag' impeller kit. summit had an inexpensive windage tray, so i adapted it.

the rear diff was rebuilt using aftermarket GM perf. parts australian BW 3.70 gear set. ( $ 270 or so at the time), since my factory rearend was the Aussie borgwarner.

i made my own custom floorboard-fitting driveshaft loop since i knew i would be running slicks and needed to meet NHRA req's for slicks.
i installed extended studs on my rear axles.

also required for slicks was a scattershield bellhousing. these were cheap from summit, but needed extensive modding to fit a 3rd gen Fbird at the time.

the car, after a year and half, roared to life in the warehouse. in the meantime, i had managed to cut 250 pounds of dead weight out of the car - bumper beams, emissions crap and other bracketry/sound deadening, etc.

the car now weighed 3070 ( vs the actual stock weight of 3320), and was ready for testing of the new, mighty, heavily modded 355.

keep in mind, that in 1992, the people who were modding stock-based EFI systems were a new and rare breed, made up of mostly Buick GN guys, 5.0 mustang dudes and a very few Fbody freaks like myself and Dave Pike.

the computer solution, along with the initial track times of the shakedown runs will be posted in PT.3....
 
almost everything IVE seen you do in those threads was impressive!, most guys seldom take the effort to learn HOW or WHY things work and just slap parts together, its refreshing to see guys who take the extra effort to see things are done correctly, Im always amazed at the guys who have a fairly decent car but just won,t take that extra effort to carefully match components, do some careful clearance work and make everything fit and function correctly, but those are the same guys that just don,t understand why they are always a few tenths slower than the few guys who do take the extra time and effort, "HEY I HAVE THE EXACT SAME PARTS HE HAS, HOW COME HES FASTER?" is not a rare response, quickly followed by "I bet he has a different cam than he said hes running, or hes got a nitrous system hidden in the car".....the truth is that all those little insignificant and time consuming little tweaks add up, and 1, hp here and 3 hp there, a few thousands extra clearance, a bit better valve springs, checking the fit and geometry, over a dozen mods does make a differencewelcome aboard, tell your buddies!
 
Joe & Grump,
I often wondered how in Tar nation you lined everything up,Gaskets intake, heads etc without some kinds of line-up pins.
(like on motorcycle cases) There always seemed to be just enough "play"
in the componants to get things mis-aligned.
I would spend alot of time Blueing and scribing and trimming.
Take things apart and see where they were obviously not in quite the right place.
I had several guys who stopped by while I was tinkering around the garage and scoffed at my attempts to get EVERYTHING lined up spot on.
Motorcycles ,Chainsaws, my 280zx, heck even the Briggs and Stratton on the snowblower I re-built some one gave us.
Thanks for sharing the Build, I know I'm working on the right track.
Tuck\o/
 
i think the possibility of slight misalignment during assembly is one of the drawbacks of the 5 piece TPI setup.

good point, friar tuck.

i used sharp Xacto knife blades to make scribe lines across the two parts at each juncture. is it was like a puzzle, the assembly had to be mocked up, marked, then half disassemble one side at a time etc. to do the port matching across the joint. bent little wires with a 1/4' perpendicular bend at the tip was dragged across the joint to assess which port needed material removed to match the joining part. this took a week of my evenings, and of course was done after the major porting to all the pieces took place.

is my description making any sense?
 
one more thing:

in order for my xacto marks to show up clearly, i ground a flat area across the two pieces as a 'marking ' area.
 
even though it was 15 years ago, little details are coming back to me as i revisit the topic.

the manifold base to head port matching was done by bolting the manifold base down, putting the feeler wire through the port and carefully feeling for ridges at the port interface. remove manifiold, adjustments were made, repeated as necessary till no ridge could be felt by the feeler wire. for this method to work, gasket matching was done as carefully as possible prior to this stage. it helped to start this phase with the head ports slightly larger than the mani ports, since the heads were mounted to the engine, did not want any porting trash going down into the motor.

once the mani base was done, i carried the process up through the runners and eventually the plenum/runner interface.

there were alignment marks for each piece that marked lateral, vertical etc locations.
 
Back
Top