nothing fancy but a solid 515 hp SBC build with good parts

Grumpy

The Grumpy Grease Monkey mechanical engineer.
Staff member
http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/90...e=cxrecs&cx_navSource=related-bottom#cxrecs_s
p168776.jpg

p168777.jpg

p168778.jpg

p168779.jpg

Nothing less than Sportsman Racing– forged dished pistons would do for this motor. The dish keeps the compression down to 9.8:1. The rods are Scat H-beam 4340 forgings with ARP bolts.


p168780.jpg

Scat also supplied the 4130 forged-steel internally balanced 3.75-inch stroke crank held in place with ARP fasteners.



p168781.jpg

p168782.jpg

p168783.jpg

p168784.jpg

With a roller cam, it just makes sense to complete the system with a high-quality set of Pro Magnum roller rockers. We started with a set of 1.6 rockers to pump the valve lift to 0.614 inch on the intake and 0.620 inch on the exhaust.


p168785.jpg

p168786.jpg

p168787.jpg

p168788.jpg

p168789.jpg

p168790.jpg


We tested Son of Muscle Mouse on Ken Duttweiler’s dyno. After abusing the small-block for a couple of days, we managed to wring out as much as 515 hp at 6,300, and a stout 474 lb-ft of torque at 4,800 rpm. We made max horsepower with the larger 1-7/8-inch Hedman headers, while the 1-5/8-inch headers delivered the big torque numbers.

In a time not so long ago, CHP built a motor we called the Muscle Mouse. With a stock iron 400 block, Dart 215cc Iron Eagle heads, a Scat cast crank, and 4340 steel rods we had a winner on our hands. On Ken Duttweiler’s dyno, the small-block strong-armed its way to 455 hp at 5,500 and 498 lb-ft of torque at a streetable 3,800 rpm. We stuffed the motor in Bob Moore’s Camaro and took it to the track. That’s when it proceeded to eat itself alive.

The autopsy revealed that the engine had been improperly balanced, because we did not include the roll pin in the rear crank flange, and the externally balanced flexplate was positioned one bolt hole off during the balance procedure. When the flexplate was installed correctly in the car, the slight imbalance quickly destroyed the mains, killing the crank, block, and rods.
After the memorial service, we vowed to build another small-block. This story is all about the Son of Muscle Mouse. In the gestation period, Ventura Motorsports engine builder Ed Taylor and the CHP staff decided to build this version with an emphasis on more muscle.

The Technology

Foundations are the key to horsepower. We plan on supercharging this rascal at a later date, so we called Dart Machinery for one of the Little M blocks. With thicker siamesed cylinder walls and a 0.625-inch minimum deck thickness, the Dart Little M is one stout block. The pan rails are spread 0.400 inch while retaining the more popular two-piece rear-main seal. If desired, this block could be built as large as 455 ci using the 0.300-inch taller 9.325-inch deck height.

While we were sorely tempted to crank the displacement with a longer stroke, we stayed with the stock stroke but pumped the strength with a Scat 4130 steel forged crank. Matching the crank is a set of Scat 4340 steel H-beam–style rods pinned to Sportsman Racing Pistons (SRP) forged pistons with 21cc-dished pistons to limit the compression to 9.8:1. Along with the Speed-Pro 1/16-inch rings and the Federal-Mogul bearings, we also included a complete Moroso lubrication system.

Our original 406 used Dart Iron Eagle 215cc heads, but we decided to step up to a set of Dart PRO-1 aluminum CNC-ported heads. These heads retain the standard 23-degree valve angle sitting in a 66cc CNC-machined combustion chamber using a 227cc intake port. The heads are finished off with a set of 2.08-/1.60-inch valves and 1.550-inch diameter roller cam springs and titanium retainers.

CHP’s flow testing revealed nearly 300 cfm of flow at 0.600-inch lift on the intake side, but more importantly, these heads crank out some impressive flow numbers at 0.300- and 0.400-inch lift. It is these mid-lift flow numbers that will support a strong torque curve as well as excellent peak power.

In keeping with our Dart theme, we also added Dart’s single-plane intake manifold mounted with a Barry Grant Race Demon 825-cfm double-pumper carburetor. The Race Demon also features removable venturis so we can experiment with various sizes to more accurately match the carb size to the engine.

Test Time

The Dart block required very little machine work other than boring to 4.155 inches and a torque-plate hone from Jim Grubbs Motorsports. Ed Taylor then had to do a minor amount of block massaging to notch the bottom of the bores to clear the big ends of the rods. Once he had completed the meticulous assembly, it was time to put our bruiser to the test.

After a quick break-in and some initial abuse, Taylor determined that the engine preferred 36 degrees of total timing and some minor jet changes with the Demon carburetor. He performed the first tests with the smaller 1-5/8-inch Hedman headers eventually produced 474 lb-ft of torque at 4,800 and 490 hp at 6,000. These primary pipes are actually a little small for a 406ci engine, so Taylor then swapped on a set of 1-7/8-inchers since a set of 1-¾-inch headers were not available at the time.

We assumed that the larger headers would lose a little torque down low and improve the horsepower above 5,000 rpm, which did occur. However, between 3,400 and 3,600 rpm, the larger headers actually delivered as much as 12 lb-ft more torque. We knew from the flowbench testing that the Dart PRO-1 exhaust port was extremely good, so this torque difference indicated that the smaller headers were over-scavenging the exhaust in this rpm range. The simple fix would be to change to a single-pattern cam that would improve the torque with the smaller headers and possibly peak horsepower as well.

Also, a set of 1-¾-inch headers would probably be the best overall choice for this engine even though time limitations prevented us from testing either the cam or header ideas. Clearly, there’s more left in this engine, especially if we combined a single-pattern cam with the 1-¾-inch headers. Ultimately, we plan to stuff this muscular Mouse in a Chevelle with a TCI TH400 trans and converter to test its dragstrip mettle. In a 3,650-pound car with 3.73 gears and decent traction, we conservatively estimate that this combination should run low 12s at 115 mph and possibly dip into the high 11s.

Muscle Mouse not only exceeded our expectations but also appears to be healthy and able to take on any challenge we put it up against. Stick with us—this promises to be fun.
 
Last edited:
http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/en...e=cxrecs&cx_navSource=related-bottom#cxrecs_s
Small Heads Keep Power Where We Like It
PT.03-572 lb-ft torque and 515 hp raises the bar.
Mike Petralia Jun 7, 2005 0 Comment(s)
Share
We're sticking to a set formula with Major Mouse. And that formula is: Test only one part at a time to see what kind of effect it has on power. This way, we can find out if there's a hidden power producer lying around out there, or if the claims of ultimate power made by some manufacturers are just bunk. And since they're such a hugely controversial product today, we've tested yet another set of aluminum cylinder heads for Major Mouse (MM) Part 03-Test 03.

MAJOR PARTS SWAP
As is our usual way we swapped heads and then bolted MM back onto Speed-O-Motive's DTS dyno to flog the you-know-what out of them. We once again broke into little bro Danger Mouse's treasure chest of booty and stole the old set of Dart Pro 180s we'd tested on DM before. We made no other changes at all and plugged it back into the dyno. After warming up the Major and making sure timing was set the same as last month--32 degrees--we started our first series of dyno pulls.

DYNO POWER
The Major didn't respond all that well to the relatively small Dart heads and we don't exactly know why. When we'd last tested this set of heads ("DM31," SC March '05), it was on a stand-in engine we called "the Imposter" because Danger Mouse was on the disabled list. Although, that engine was built almost identically to DM, so we felt it was a suitable test subject. The Dart Pro 180 heads on "the Imposter" produced some good numbers. Even higher peak and average HP figures than some of the past's best heads, so we thought their performance advantage would cross over to the larger Major Mouse--but, it didn't. When compared to the peak and average numbers of the last two month's tests, we see that the Dart Pro 180's might not be the best choice for this large small-block. That's not to say they're a bad head. To the contrary, we've proven that they're a formidable power producer when used on a smaller displacement engine. And if your mind is already made up that your next set of heads will be from Dart, we're sure that you would not be unsatisfied with the power they're able to produce on any engine. This just further proves our point that making power is all about properly matching components. And that's why we're taking the time and spending the money doing all this stuff. So you will be able to make the best decisions on your next engine.

0506sc.jpg

0506sc1.jpg

0506sc2.jpg

0506sc3.jpg

0506sc4.jpg

0506sc5.jpg

0506sc6.jpg





Finally, to make sure we covered all the bases, we always check, and sometimes recalibrate, the fuel curve of our Demon carb to see if we'd missed something. But, power remained constant using the same jets as last time.

MAJOR MOUSE SPECS FOR PART 03 - TEST 03:
As in our usual format, we left everything else the same and only changed cylinder heads this month. All other items in this test--i.e. timing, jetting, cam installed position, etc.--were duplicated from last month.427 cid, 11.0:1 cr, 4.125-inch bore Mowtown iron four-bolt block, 4.00-inch stroke Lunati crank, 5.850-inch Lunati rods, Lunati pistons (14cc dish) installed @ "0" deck, Lunati Moly rings, Dart Pro 180 heads (64cc chambers, 180cc intake ports, 74cc exhaust ports, 2.02-inch intake valves, 1.60-inch exhaust valves, angle plugs), Edelbrock Performer RPM Air Gap intake manifold, Edelbrock Performer RPM hydraulic roller camshaft installed at 108-degree intake CL (234/238 @ .050, 296/300 adv, .574/.584 lift w/ COMP 1.6:1 rockers, 112 LS),
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/edl-2210
Demon 750 carb, 32 degrees total advance, "0" degree Crank Angle Offset
(C.A.O.)*, 91-octane Shell gasoline. Tested on Speed-O-Motive's DTS dyno.*C.A.O. refers to the setting on the Pertronix "Second Strike" ignition box. It re-fires the spark plug after its initial firing, such as 32 degrees BTDC on the first strike, and then maybe once again at 30 degrees BTDC. In this case, as was the same last month, Major Mouse responded best to a C.A.O. of "0" degrees, meaning there was actually no second strike of the spark plug. In the past on some other engines we've found extra power by re-firing the plug around 2-3 degrees later, but not this time.

DART PRO 1 (180cc) FLOW NUMBERS
When shopping for cylinder heads there's lots of choices to consider and not every one of them will work best in every situation. So it's important to collect as much data as possible and then make your decision on what you've learned. When comparing cylinder heads, it's important to look at other figures besides just airflow. Port volumes, chamber shape and size, valve sizes, angle and locations, how much spring/lift they can take, and will it match your camshaft? These are just a few of the items that you should base your decision on, not just the power they produced in some magazine story. I also personally feel that a good indicator of how well a cylinder head will work is it's ratio of intake to exhaust flow, listed as "I/E flow" in this chart. Although this is not the "Holy Grail" of horsepower, it does indicate a head's potential to move air into and out of the cylinders effectively. A head with a ratio of less than 60 percent is not a very effective air mover, particularly since it indicates that it can move air in, but not out of the cylinders. A head with a ratio of over 90 percent, although rare, is capable of extremely good power numbers so keep an eye out for it. Check out the very high 85-percent I/E flow at .200-lift of the Dart Pro 180. This is an area of critical performance for any head, but particularly a street head that won't be run with much lift. Since the valve will see this area twice during every cycle, once on the way up and then again on the way down--as opposed to seeing max lift only once in every cycle--low-lift flow figures are often overlooked, but very critical to making the best power.

I am building an off idle 383. It will go into a street car. It will never be raced. It should never be necessary for it to exceed 5,500 RPM.
Now for the questions. I am considering using an Eagle, street performance rotator assembly kit. It is advertised as being balanced. The machine shop is telling me that I should pay them $240.00 to balance it because Eagle's balance will be off by as much as 2 grams.
I would like to know if anyone has had problems with the balance on Eagle assemblies and if 2 grams is going to cause an issue with a low RPM engine. Thank you, Tim


from what I've seen in the past EAGLES balanced assembly's are not as well balanced as they could be and yes, your machine shop is probably correct.
personally I've found the SCAT rotating assemblies to be a better value with closer tolerances
that being stated I don,t think you would have major issues if you carefully verify clearances , and installed it without additional,balance work.
(personally Id cough up the extra $240 as insurance the jobs done correctly, it beats pulling it down later




READ THESE THREAD's

and don,t skip the sub linked info
http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/engine-balancing.3900/
http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/engine-balancing.3900/#post-57940
 
There is a lot to be researched yet by me Grumpy on Cylinder head Exhaust to Intake Flow Ratio.
Its kinda top secret stuff in the Racing World.
I have noticed Pontiac engineers spent a lot of time balancing E/I Ratios on known factory performance iron heads.
 
Back
Top