This Crap Should Scare You

Grumpy

The Grumpy Grease Monkey mechanical engineer.
Staff member

this should prove the dems are insane, they want to defund the police and disarm all civilians.
if they want to do this to semi auto rifles,as a starting point,
that are used in less than 5% of crime you know damn well handguns used in most crime are next on the commie agenda,
REALLY, how dumb to you have to be to expect gang members and drug dealers who do many crimes and drive-by shootings to register the guns,
they stole and pay taxes on them.




riflet.png

lives7.jpg

lives10.jpg

lives11.jpg
 
Last edited:
OP-ED

At The Missoulian: This Election Will Determine Future Of Private Gun Ownership In US
13 AUG , 2020

Dr. John Lott has a piece in today’s. UPDATE: It also appeared in Butte, Montana’s Montana Standard on Friday, August 14, 2020.

This past week, President Trump claimed the election will determine the future of private gun ownership in the United States.

He’s right. And Montana voters’ choice for the U.S. Senate looks set to determine its balance of power. If they gain control, Joe Biden and Senate Democrats promise to eliminate the filibuster, allowing them to pass any legislation they want with a simple majority vote.

But the Senate won’t just determine what gun control legislation gets passed — it will also determine what judges get confirmed.

There are few issues that divide Democrat- and Republican-appointed judges more consistently and completely than gun control. President Trump’s 200 federal judicial confirmations have only just brought the courts into balance, with Democrat-appointees still controlling circuit courts for 24 states plus D.C.

The states Democrats control judicially are ones that they also tend to control legislatively. These circuit courts approve any and all of the regulations they get passed, no matter how flagrantly they infringe on the right to keep and bear arms.

Don’t expect the Supreme Court to restrain these courts. All four Democrat appointments claim people don’t have a right to self-defense. Indeed, they have already noted they will vote to overturn the court’s 2008 Heller and 2010 McDonald decisions. Those rulings merely ensured the government could not completely ban guns.

Four Republican-appointed justices clearly care about the right to self-defense. But they won’t take up gun control cases for fear Justice John Roberts will side with the liberal justices. He has already done so on religious freedom cases, DACA and Obamacare.

Montana’s two current senators are sharply divided who should be on the courts. Sen. Jon Tester voted for Supreme Court Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, who do not believe there is an individual right to self-defense. He opposed Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, who support that right.

Sen. Steve Daines has voted the opposite way.

If Gov. Steve Bullock replaces Daines this November and gives Democrats control of the Senate, that means more judges in the vein of Sotomayor and Kagan.

California shows us what the future of gun ownership can look like. For example, no one has figured out how to meet the state’s requirement for micro-stamping — a technology by which firing pins will supposedly imprint a unique identifying code on each shell casing. Even if someone could implement this expensive technology, a criminal could circumvent it by simply filing down the pin or replacing it. But handguns that don’t meet these impossible regulations will soon be banned. Given the 9th Circuit Court’s liberal bent, unless Trump fills another Supreme Court vacancy, California’s restrictions will likely be upheld.

This year, the Democrat’s convention platform is focused on a radical gun control agenda. It advocates licensing for gun owners, allowing gun makers to be held liable whenever someone uses a gun to commit a crime or cause an accident, and banning some types of semi-automatic guns based on appearance rather than on function. Neither Tester or Bullock have made any public comments opposing this platform.

Bullock attacks “Dark Money groups like the NRA, who are spending millions to try to divide this nation and thwart progress.” but he never criticizes the vastly greater amounts that New York billionaire Michael Bloomberg spends. While the NRA spent $18.9 million on all campaigns in 2018, Michael Bloomberg put up $110 million just for congressional campaigns, even more than that on state legislative races across the country.

Montanans cherish their freedoms. It would be ironic if Montanans provide the deciding votes that kill the Second Amendment and Americans’ right to defend themselves and their families.

John Lott, “This election will determine future of private gun ownership in US,” The Missoulian, August 13, 2020.
 
The same exact things were said at the beginning of the Clinton admin. And again when the Obama administration looked like it was happening. It will be the same stories 4 years from now, more threats, I’ll bet anything we all will be in the same situation come next election.
Oh, of course “Trump says.” He’s desperately throwing everything out there that scares his base so that everyone whines and stirs up fear. Trump is so scared, every day it’s a new lie.
 
Well I believe in Trump a whole lot more than Joe and the Hoe and all politicians lie but I truly believe Trump does love the USA and the others are out to get whatever they can out of it plus Joes already robbed us for 60 years let someone else rob us for a while and lastly how could anyone vote for Kamala Harris I saw her 4 times in 4 days claiming a different nationality I sure don't want anybody making decisions that effect my life that doesn't even know where she came from
 

the whole concept is to get a detailed and extensive registration for later total confiscation
 
Well I believe in Trump a whole lot more than Joe and the Hoe and all politicians lie but I truly believe Trump does love the USA and the others are out to get whatever they can out of it plus Joes already robbed us for 60 years let someone else rob us for a while and lastly how could anyone vote for Kamala Harris I saw her 4 times in 4 days claiming a different nationality I sure don't want anybody making decisions that effect my life that doesn't even know where she came from

The democrats have been pulling down statues of George Washington because he owned slaves. They’ve been pulling down statues of Thomas Jefferson because he owned slaves. They’ve been pulling down statues of Alexander Hamilton because he owned slaves...etc.

Now they want to put a woman who is a direct beneficiary of five slave plantations and more than 200 slaves. There’s no denying the facts of this. Her family had five slave plantations, 200+ slaves. The family wealth was created by black slaves working these plantations.

So the democrats are out there ripping down all these statues of slave owners. Now they’re gonna put kamala harris in the White House, whose family was ‘big time’ into black slave ownership.

This is absolutely laughable.

If the dems did not have double standards then they would have no standards.
 
Back
Top