using a decent carbine on an elk hunt

grumpyvette

Administrator
Staff member
back around 1999-2003 I made the trip out to Colorado with Mike ,Frank, and Jack, we made arrangements to meet Sal who had recently moved to Idaho, out near Gypsum Co. where we generally hunt Elk.
I was driving my 1996 ford 4x4 bronco frank drove his 1980 bronco.
We had decided before the season to back-pack into an area in a remote series of smaller canyons that we knew from experience generally held a good herd of elk ,most years.
the reason it was seldom hunted was the area was a bit too steep, and thickly over grown with aspen on one slope and conifer on the far slope in much of the canyons making easy travel for horses a problem, and it was easily an hour and a half too two hours walk in from the nearest logging road access, so we had no walk in visitors. the area had many areas covered in loose brick red dirt or grey shale or pine needles ,most of the time we walked thru either aspen in various stages of loosing leaves or thick conifer. we had to pack carefully, because walking in especially with a heavy packs a real P.I.T.A. and we wanted carry the minimum weight and gear, because if we were successful we would carry more weight in meat out!
We also know that the ranges we would be hunting at would be short and a longer barrel rifle was not needed or as useful as a lighter and shorter carbine.
I decided to carry my sako bolt action mannlicher carbine in 375 H&H, and yes I took a good deal of verbal abuse over that choice.
Especially from Jack who was carrying a 308 win, and had never owned a 375H&H, Jack was a metro SWAT sniper at the time and he choice a Remington 308 carbine with a medium weight barrel with which he could keep very tight groups in practice , Sal had a custom Ruger 77 in 338/06, mike carried a 35 whelen in a 7600 Remington.
I still use my 35 whelen 7600 pump action,and 450 marlin blr
7600re.png

Browning_BLRa.jpg

the area we walked into requires walking into a fairly steep side canyon, following a small creek down into a small meadow than walking up into an adjacent drainage and camping while disturbing as little of the area as we possibly could.
We walked into the area at late afternoon and camped cold so as not to make our presents in the area known. we camped on a small bench or step in the side of the canyon slope that was about 60 feet by 15 feet that provided the only reasonably level area that was about 3/4 of the way up a side canyon wall, that night was bitter cold and we had set up camp using three small lean-too tarp shelters which provided minimal shelter , but we all had decent sleeping bags and covers for them.
It sure seemed that morning took a very long time coming, and not starting with hot coffee was at least for me less than ideal.
morning slowly came, the temps were in the 25F-30f range and most of our canteens were 1/2 frozen.
we packed out back-packs and sleeping bags trying to make as little noise as we could and whispered as we discussed the areas in the canyon we expected to see game travel thru as the surge of opening day hunters pushed game into our area from the far more easily accessed areas surrounding us.
Jack and I teamed up and walked down to a rock formation that was about 1/2 way up the side canyon slope and about 1/4 mile further up the drainage.
Once we arrived we found a good location that allowed a good field of fire controlling several hundred square yards in several directions and we both sat looking at slightly different areas of the canyon, hoping to remain totally unseen.
after about 10 am. we we both starting to think the whole idea must be flawed because we could not have seen more than a few mule deer and cow elk,and no legal antlered male elk, which was in theory the reason we had made the effort to pack into this area in the first, place.
we broke out the granola bars and canteens and quietly discussed the absurdity of driving several thousand miles and paying $1000 plus dollars to sit next to a freezing rock watching for elk that we probably would not shoot unless they were better than average in size and had decent antlers because we had learned thru hard experience, that it was a huge and difficult job to dress and pack out an elk from this far off the road.
by about 10.45 A.M. both jack and I were grinning and swapping jokes quietly , and probably not really paying full attention when we herd shots far down the canyon. it was not from the area Frank,mike and Sal had gone to watch, but it seemed to come from about 2/3rds a mile down canyon.
we glassed the area around us then further down canyon, eventually we saw several groups of mule deer moving up the far canyon slope toward us.
at about 11.20A.M. I saw a really impressive mule deer slipping thru the far slope timber, I pointed it out to Jack, I had a mule deer tag so did jack, I glassed the deer carefully and decided Id pass if jack wanted it....I let jack glass the deer with my 10x50mm binoculars.
Jack said it was a really nice mule deer and that I should take it, because He had already taken a nice mule deer two years previously.
Ive taken several nice but not exceptional elk but never as nice of a mule deer as this and the whole discussion had taken about 30 seconds to a minute.
I placed my pack next to the large rock we were sitting next too and used it as a rifle rest.
the range was estimated too be about 275 yards,this was an exceptionally long range shot for the area we hunt,but I looked at the laminated trajectory chart taped to my carbines stock and felt confident it was well within range, I worked the bolt, slid a long cartridge into the chamber and closed the bolt ,I wrapped the sling around my arm, sat where I could support the carbine with my arm resting on my leg and the back-pack for a dead solid rest, I placed the horizontal cross hairs of the scope on the deers upper chest, lead him about 12 inches , with the vertical cross hair on his neck,as he was walking slowly, and as he cleared a group of aspen squeezed off the shot.
Jack muttered something , and as I came off recoil I saw the deer sliding down slope and an aspen tree behind his previous location slowly falling over as the 375 slug had blown a significant chunk off one side, of the aspen.
When Jack saw the aspen starting to fall, he assumed I had hit the tree in front of the deer ,not behind the deer , with the exiting bullet, as he had lost site of the deer.
mule-deer1.jpg

the deer slid down the slope, after bullet impact until it hit against a aspen tree, and lodged.
I assured him that I thought it was a good well placed shot and we packed up our stuff up, put on our packs to go look.
the slope on both our side and the far slope were far steeper than they looked and it took at least 20 minutes to reach the area the deer had been standing at, there was a noticeable spray of blood on the cut off aspen which was about 4" in diameter, and must have been within feet of the deer as the bullet exited.
after about 30 minutes the other guys in the group showed up to help, most had seen game but nothing worth shooting YET. that would change over the next few days.
we found the mule deer buck about 30 yards down the slope from where he was hit, where he obviously slid ,after being hit and dropped, the bullet punched strait thru but expanded and did a good job of knocking the buck silly as it went thru, and exited.
the bullet had hit just behind the front leg,and exited in a similar location on the other side,of the chest, but a bit lower than expected as the range was closer to 300-310 yards.
the slope was so steep that we tied the bucks antlers, and neck to a near by aspen as far up as we could reach to a rope and a small block & tackle I carry while hunting,and simply allowing the carcase to slide a bit further down hill , which resulted in it hanging mostly off the ground for the dressing out and butchering process, even before I used the block & tackle to lift the deer.
having a small block & tackle is a great help with elk because you can,t lift one .
we packed the meat in large plastic bags and each of us packed out about 30lbs-35lbs of steaks.
Jack later said the 270 grain 375 caliber bullet impact seemed to do more damage to the aspen than the mule deer buck, as it passed thru his chest, it left a 2"-3" diameter area of destroyed meat/organs.
all the guys naturally good Naturedly grumbled about hauling meat out to the truck, but several more guys connected that year so we obviously helped them back pack out their venison as required.
in fact that year we only got one elk but three mule deer bucks so everyone but Frank got a tag filled and Frank had several chances
once back in the trucks the meat was re-wrapped and packed in coolers with dry ice.
Jack purchased a bolt action 375 h&h browning A BOLT rifle for the next years hunt after seeing the results of my 375 H&H carbine, as he was rather impressed with what that carbine had done to that mule deer and cutting the aspen behind the deer as the bullet exited really impressed him!
jackaba.png

JACKS A BOLT looked like this
sako375man.jpg


its a rifle I saw advertized about 25 to 35 years ago in one of the shotgun news papers and I decided on the spot to order one ,after looking at the pictures, its proven to be, at least for me the near ideal dark timber spot and stalk and still hunting combo, the only thing I needed to do was bed the rifle action into the stock and epoxy in two
6 inch long, parallel 1/4" sections of screw thread rod under the barrel so 3" of each rod section extended into the fore end and back into the main stock in groove I routed into the fore end,this was necessary because recoil from a 375 H&H without that mod allowed the forward wood (separate stock section with joint under front barrel band)to slide forward, once that was done the rifles been very accurate and dependable,for decades and with several elk and a dozen or more mule deer, to its credit.
the bedding mod is not visible and I can,t see why the factory did not make a one piece stock
Ive owned and hunted with a sako mannlicher carbine in caliber 375 H&H for 25-35 plus years, mine looks very similar to this but mines darker walnut wood.
be aware the wood forward of the barrel band needs to be epoxy bedded to the main stock or it will move forward under repeat recoil.
I cut two parallel grooves inside my front stock extending about 3" in both directions and carefully fitted two 6" long 3/16" thread rods and bedding epoxy, into the grooves, this cured that issue.
if you had a chance to buy a carbine like that Id say jump on it , I paid nearly $1000 for mine decades ago.
and yes both bullet weights work but the 270 grains seem to work better
after dozens of elk hunts in Colorado and Wyoming, I learned you can,t assume you can wonder around a particular area that may look good or one conveniently located close to where your camped,
Successfully looking to find elk, requires, you to cover a good deal of topography and have a decent understanding of what the elk need and are looking to avoid.
it also helps if you have a good understanding of the natural terrain choke points, preferred browse/feed, cover, escape,routes,, bedding areas, water access.etc.
generally most guys won,t get more than a mile off logging road access simply because its too hard to retrieve a downed elk and pack it out where no motor vehicle access is allowed.
you can also find real honey spots if you hunt areas that require you wade creeks or climb or descend into canyons,
I can,t begin to tell you how many times I hunted canyons and had new guys after 1- or- 2 days sit out the rest of the trip hunting near camp rather than climb in and out of canyon country,
as a consequence, I generally learn to pack fairly light, Im prepaired to spend the night if its required and I rarely see other hunters after opening day, in the rather remote canyon country.
http://www.handloads.com/loaddata/defau ... le&Source=
Ive found both 235grain and 270 grain bullets and WW760 with a 215 fed primer works well as an elk hunting load

http://www.midsouthshooterssupply.com/i ... =000212471

http://www.midsouthshooterssupply.com/i ... =000212472

sakocarbine.png


Arac said:
elkpic1z.png



Maybe it is just me, but that spot looks a bit high, no?

When I first started hunting elk I used to aim a bit lower (1/3rd up) as your suggesting ,thinking that a hit directly thru the heart would produce better results , and perhaps its only because IVE USED A 340 WBY AND A 375 H&H FOR THE VAST MAJORITY OF MY ELK HUNTS THAT Ive gotten the results that I have, but I can assure you that shot placement gets the desired results, perhaps its shocking the spine or central nervous system, but the end result is the lungs and arteries above the heart being pulverized drops the elk very effectively.
youll get a dead elk with a decent hit from a reasonable caliber in either location, but its been my experience that the lower impact point tends to result in a frantic death run while the higher point of impact tends to result in a collapse or staggering drunkenly then nose first in the dirt inside a few yards, and yes there's always exceptions,but I can assure you a properly placed 250-270 grain projectile from a 340 WBY AND A 375 H&H gets the elk to drop quickly
bloodd.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: using a decent carbine

I don,t remember the exact year , but it was in the early 1990s, Mike and Jack and Frank and I were the only guys that could make the trip out to hunt elk that year,from our group of obsessed Florida elk hunters. frank is a member , of our group who used to live in FLA., but he moved too and lives in Colorado at that time so Jack, Mike and I had piled into my 1987 ford f350 dually truck , and splitting expenses we had too drive out to near gypsum Colorado to go elk and mule deer hunting, frank was going to get off work and join us at the camp site we had been using for several years previously.
we had as usual driven strait thru in shifts of about 4-5 hours over about 46 hours drive time from Florida, its a 2350 mile run each way so we averaged about 50mph on the trip, it took longer than average because that year there seemed to be a near endless line of construction sines limiting travel to a single lane moving at a snails pace and over extended distance areas in Tennessee,Kentucky and Missouri , plus it had rained during a good part of the trip from Florida thru Georgia, the result was the trip took us at least 4-6 hours longer than average.
We had arrived at the intended camp site only to find it occupied , we moved down the logging access road about 2 miles further north and called Franks wife to let him know of the change in our camp site!
That night before the season opened it snowed , which is usually a great help as it makes it far easier to see and track elk, and because elk seldom stay in the same area for more than a day or so, being pushed by hunting pressure and road traffic to the more remote areas, the fact that we were forced to move the original camp site was no big deal, you normally must remain very flexible as there little sense in hunting where the elk have vacated, you must to be successful locate the herds.
Well we knew we were locked into camping, at the new site, until Frank showed up that evening, at the spot we had moved too,because thats where franks wife would tell him to meet us. and having hunted the area previously we knew it fairly well as did frank.
so opening morning at about 4am we slowly forced our self's to climb out of the sleeping bags into what felt like brutally cold conditions (the thermometer said it was 23F.) and at near 10,000 feet elevation, its hard to breath, and if your from FLORIDA thats COLD, and its not uncommon to get altitude sickness! , and yes I'm well aware most of you gentlemen deal with 23F as a nice day, and you don,t live within 100 ft of sea level.....lets just say it takes getting some time to get used too the temp. and altitude.!
snowwood1.jpg

snowwood.jpg

a good deal of the area looked similar to this
it was dark, a bit windy and still snowing lightly, so we decided that mike and jack and I would scout out a long fairly narrow ridge line that started about 100 yards to the west of our camp site and extended first up and then gradually downward into a canyon, where it eventually joined a second ridge line.
this ridge varied in width from 100 yards to 400 yards wide the crest was well timbered and had not been logged the south face had been extensively logged several years previously so it had a slope covered with old branch and trash,cuttings short stumps and sporadic new growth.
it was the new growth and the grasses that tend to grow in the logged areas that tend to attract deer and elk, the higher ridge provided cover and an escape route if the elk felt threatened , and having hunted that ridge the year before and knowing it eventually ran into the upper edge of a canyon, which we had frequently killed elk in made it a decent place to hunt.
KNOWING SHOTS WOULD LIKELY BE CLOSE AND ACTION FREQUENTLY WOULD INVOLVE MOVING GAME,
I decided to carry my sako bolt action mannlicher carbine in 375 H&H, and yes I took a good deal of verbal abuse over that choice, and good nature ribbing because most people in camp think its a cannon.
BUT this has been a consistently effective carbine , loaded with 270 grain projectiles over a stiff load of 77 grains of WW760 with a 215 fed primer, its short easy to handle and really effective.
I try to make most shots art game, while sitting using a sling, with a 13"/27" harris bi-pod
https://ads.midwayusa.com/product/2...MI-YK985jm2QIVDksNCh0klghpEAQYAiABEgKZZvD_BwE
I constantly practice shooting both sitting and standing, for many, shots are taken, sitting using a sling, no bi-pod, but several were taken ,standing shooting offhand while using a sling.
I can generally hit most shots more than 70%-80% in a coke can size target,shooting offhand, with a sling out to about 100 yards,( hitting a 3.5"-4" circle)but cut that group size in 1/2 sitting with a sling, and a bit better still with a sling and bi-pod.
most of the game I've shot has been dropped at under 250 yards and mostly in thicker timber or narrow canyons, where ranges are generally not excessive
http://www.handloads.com/loaddata/defau ... le&Source=
sako375man.jpg

while this is NOT my 375 H&H sako carbine, in the picture posted above, My SAKO CARBINE is almost an exact clone except, that my stocks about 5 shades darker, so its about as dark as walnut gets.
I found this picture posted on the internet, it could be a clone of the sako carbine Ive used for decades, if the stock color was about 6 shades darker walnut ,
mines about the color of a semi sweet dark chocolate
semibitterchoc.JPG

its a rifle I saw advertized about 25 to 35 years ago in one of the shotgun news papers and I decided on the spot to order one ,after looking at the pictures, its proven to be, at least for me the near ideal dark timber spot and stalk and still hunting combo, the only thing I needed to do was bed the rifle action into the stock and epoxy in two
6 inch long, parallel 1/4" sections of screw thread rod under the barrel so 3" of each rod section extended into the fore end and back into the main stock in groove I routed into the fore end,this was necessary because recoil from a 375 H&H without that mod allowed the forward wood (separate stock section with joint under front barrel band)to slide forward, once that was done the rifles been very accurate and dependable,for decades and with several elk and a dozen or more mule deer, to its credit.
the bedding mod is not visible and I can,t see why the factory did not make a one piece stock
jack carried his 308 win with which he could produce amazingly tight groups off a bench rest, with 190grain hornady bullets over H4831,but I knew jack was less than impressive if forced to shoot off hand, rapidly, as he seldom bothered to practice that way, Mike had a 7mm mag on that trip,loaded with 160 grain hot core, speers. mike is a decent off hand shot ,out to 100 yards or so, and can also shoot well from a rest. I do the vast majority of my shooting from a sitting position with a sling if the opportunity is there to do so, but I also practice shooting off hand constantly, now admittedly that doesn,t mean I'm an exceptionally good, shot , but only that I know my limitations and I can reasonably expect to hit a walking elk fairly close to the intended spot, if given the opportunity, under most conditions.
well that morning we separated, and decided to each still hunt the extended ridge line, so that mike was going to still hunt the center crest of the ridge and Jack and I would still hunt the opposite edges of the timber on the ridge crest where they skirted the logged slopes on both sides.
as we started, walking in, it was so dark we could barely see to walk, the snow reflecting light between the trees helped vision but it was easily 30-45 minutes before legal shooting time as we started walking into the area we would be hunting, so we walked slowly trying to watch the wind direction and not making any excess noise if possible.
In the new snow that was difficult , in some areas,as snow squeaked and crunched as it was compressed under our boot soles. in other areas the pine needles allowed near silent travel.
as shooting light got better , we could make out older bark-less light gray weathered snags,and stumps, and the few young conifers that had started to regrow,mixed into the edge of the older growth , timber on the ridge crest the loggers could not easily access like the lower slopes to the sides.
and it was legal to shoot we separated and spread out and started to seriously watch and walked with even more caution.
at about 8 am I heard a single shot from the direction, I expected Mike too be in by that time,... generally a single shots a good indication games down, a flurry , of rapid shots is sometimes a good indication of a missed opportunity and crappy shooting.
As I stood still and waited to hear more shots or mike call for help dragging out his recent acquisition, I heard the rapid movement of running game and from the area mike was supposed to be hunting came several mule deer does and a faint almost un intelligible bit of artistic cursing. I started walking to where I thought mike would be, he had a decent mule deer buck down, as I walked up, and he was tying his game tag on the antlers. As I walked up he was smiling but still cussing a bit , along with a big grin, he said that he had only seen the buck mule deer , and had leaned against an old dead snag to shoot,and steady the rifle,but at the shot he had about 3 gallons of old ice and snow on the upper branches of the tree he steadied the rifle on descend in a cold wet mass on him like guys pouring a cooler full of ice on a coach after winning a big game, he had his head and collar packed with what looked like a slushy mix of ice and pine needles.
about 20 minutes late Jack found us and told us that mikes shot had caused several elk in a group, he had previously not noticed, that were about 600 yards out and down slope from jack to suddenly , break cover and start rapidly running along the ridge away from our location.
that night FRANK showed up at our camp as previously arranged,and we decided to hunt the adjoining canyon.
we didn,t see a damn thing , but a few mule deer does for several days, so we moved camp too a ridge we knew well from previous hunts,about 5 miles further north, the next morning just for giggles I started to use a cow elk call in camp and to every ones amazement a legal 4 point elk stepped out of the conifers at about 400 yards from camp, well that took about 30 seconds for jack to spot and lay his 308 win over the fords hood, take a good look and squeeze off a shot, we all started laughing as the elk spun and ran, jack was certain he connected but the elk gave no indication it was hit.
We walked over and examined the area there was no obvious blood but after careful examination we found some hair and sweeping the area we found a blood trail that ended in about 70 yards with a dead elk hit high in the lungs and a bit far back nicking the liver inn an angled chest shot.
I hunted the rest of that week and hunted hard to help too get frank a decent elk or mule deer, as franks just not good at spotting game in the field, and I was not going to shoot anything unless it was at least as nice as the best previous elk I killed as i well knew the work involved in dragging out meat filled packs, and with two kills in camp meat was not a huge issue as we generally share meat equally.
besides I had been jokingly threatened with castration if I shot some big bull elk deep in some, remote steep, ice covered canyon, several miles from any logging road access, on the last two days of the elk season, (something Id done several times previously)

have you ever been really impressed with a friends rifle...decided to buy a similar rifle only to realize it was not as ideal or impressive as your first impression?
obviously we all have different requirements and experiences,and each of us will like or appreciate different things.
Obviously my choices may not match your criteria, or aesthetic values.
back in about 1967 one of my hunting buddies purchased a marlin 444, he made some very impressive, shots and it seemed to drop deer like thors hammer,
after I purchased a similar rifle and used it for a dozen plus years, I was less impressed, and while that 444 marlin, performed well, and and after I had the time to compare it to a very similar marlin in caliber 45/70.
Well at least too me I was much more impressed with the 45/70's performance and after several decades, of using both occasionally, on hunting trips, ,
over about 30 years of hunting with the marlins,
I purchased a browning BLR , in caliber 450 marlin,
I sold both the marlin's ,
the 444 a few years after I bought the 45/70 marlin,
that as I felt that was a big improvement over the 444,
and the 45/70, was sold eventually as I felt that the 450 marlin caliber BLR, was a big improvement over the marlin 45/70.
the BLR was the noticeably superior choice,in my opinion, as it was the most accurate Id found and had a stronger action.
btw in that 450 marlin BLR, 50 grains of imr 3031 over a 215 fed primer and using a 405 Remington soft point has proven too be exceptionally effective.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top