anyone got a PROJECT in the works?

grumpyvette

Administrator
Staff member
some of the most interesting hod rodding projects from my prospective are not the high dollar builds where you just order up a bunch of components and assemble them, but the salvage yard builds where I guy gets an idea for a rather unique car and figgures out how to accomplish the components assembly.
ID be far more impressesd with a 500 caddy engine installed in a c-4 corvette that ran 11 second times than with a similar corvette powered buy a killer sbc with a nitrous kit that ran 10 second times.
a guy with a 6.8 ltr hemi from a late model wreck, or a ls1 from a wrecked vette, installed in a pinto , vega, or neon gets my interest, far more than some guys turbo supra that was basically just added parts on the standard engine . even if the supra is faster.
a freind has a t-bucket equiped with a turbo equiped 300 ford 6 cylinder , mostly built from all parts he got from salvage yard trips, I doubt it will be exceptionally fast but he gets high marks for orrignality in my opinion!
DSCN0086.jpg
 
hi grumpy,
i told you a little about my project, will post more about the specifics later our intake/ electronics experiment but here is a brief overview.

i bought a 1985 pontiac parisienne about 5 yrs ago as a daily driver.

the paint was ratty so i pulled off the vinyl roof, fixed a few dents and painted it with an ocean wave pattern that was sort of inspired by scallops on 50s hotrods. i used rustoleum from home depot mixed to my own blends of burple and purple, painted the whole thing with a brush. i used to be a sign painter, so i got a pretty good flow on the paint.

i am going to paint the logo 'TAXICAB FROM HELL' on the doors and trunk, along with bigger wheels

pontcompnew.jpg


the original 305 got tired, so i found a very nice bargain on craigslist.
a guy had a sbc 400 that was built with very high end parts and balanced/blueprinted by a reputable shop over 20 yrs ago, but the 1960 chevy belair prostreet rod he put it in was driven less than 20k miles in the entire time.

he had tried numerous setups on the motor over the years, but the setup that was the fastest was a tunnel ram with 2 fourbarrels.

my son sean has three years of mech engineering school under his belt, he convinced me to go efi for tuneability, mileage, smoothness - all the reasons you all know so well.

i wanted more top end than a tpi setup would give, even modded.

we started trying to think of a way to get the low/ mid torque of a long runner setup combined with a second stage large volume capability, trying to get the best of both worlds similar to a dual runner setup like nissan, honda and others have done.

we envisioned a sort of 'passive' dual runner simulation adding runner length to tune low end torque, then ramming high rpm air into the runners, by placing two small drive by wire throttle bodies directly over the runners( imagine two throttle bodies right on thop of the stealth ram plenum). the runner extensions can be simply machined like tall carb spacers ( bolts betweeen the plenum and base). for regular 700- 4000 rpm operation, the regular 52 mm throttle body will work as normal. then at some point in the rpm band, the secondary throttle bodies kick in , controlled by the mega squirt system programmed by us.

i know many of you will think of the downsides ;

massive height ( not a prob, i want it to stick out of the hood)

a tuning nightmare to dial in the secondary operation, seemingly needless complexity., cost.

the throttle bodies are around $100 each if we use the VW golf type. the computer will be necessary anyway, no extra cost there. the runner extensions will be machined by us, so the only cost there is aluminum. we will have to also machine a plate to accept the TBs on the plenum top, and cut the plenum. can't think of any other cost except incidentals

yes, we could make similar power using the stock stealth ram setup, but this is a theory we are dying to test out. if it works, the driveability around town will be really fun.

think about the on-car back to back chassis dyno tests we could do to verify our numbers:

test a: full operation using all 3 throttle bodies, once we dial in the optimum point ( assuming we find one!), with the runnner extensions in place. should have a strong flat torque curve ( TPI like)
and very strong hp numbers up top.

test b: remove runner extensions, run the triple throttle body setup on the stock stealth ram setup, take some time to dial in the secondary TBs, compare to test A.

test c: turn off the signal to the secondary TBs, run the stealth as stock to see if the high hp numbers change (decrease).

test d: install runner extensions again, use only single TB, see how the mid torque compares to test C.

we are going to calculate proper runner length using software ( forget what sean called it). he and his buds have done this on 4 cylinder motors and tuned their runner lengths , got great results.

anyone have any thoughts on this? need more clarification on what we are trying to do?
will the secondary throttle bodies get sucked open by intake pressure at part throttle, primary TB operation? will there be a bad effect from turbulence with 3 throttle bodies all filling the space at the same time?

will our high rpm breathing capability be limited by the runners- negating the effect of the secondary TBs?

i have studied the mid torque numbers of many setups, was looking at the comparo of super ram to stealth ram, seems the super ram has a torque peak of around 800 rpm lower. i would like to duplicate the effect of the super ram, increasing the stealth ram runners to super ram length, or close.

other info:
not sure what the cam is exactly, unfortunately. previous owner said it was an agressive high Rpm type hyd. comp cams grind. this is supported by the fact the the tunnel ram ran best on this motor. i believe he said lift in the high 4s to low 5s, with long duration, not sure about anything else. changing the cam would be easy, also maybe i will set up a test to measure what is currently in there.

heads are L98 vette heads, previous guy had them ported at some point. i understand this will probably be a weak link given what we are trying to accomplish. better heads down the road would be another great experiment.

injectors will be sufficient, sean has all the needed skills to make sure we are sizing correctly. he also is very experienced at tuning fuel/timing maps.


we will be using some type of equal length long tube headers with an x crossover.

tranny is 700r4 , will be getting a police car type caprice 10 bolt with 3.45 gear, i hope. want to maximize rear tire to 315 width , tubs will be necessary, possibly other susp mods to fit, i want to keep the fender skirts!
 
bump,

grumpy, do you have any thoughts on this setup? i know you initially wanted me to go simpler, but i hoped that filling in some of the details of why we want to do this experiment would give more incentive to get behind it.

we know it is a lot of work, and may not have the payoff we are looking for, but we love the idea of finding out something new.

the setup will stick up far above the hood, i think it will be funny and outrageous.
 
without part numbers or specific info its going to be real difficult to make the correct suggestions but a few things really stick out, first stock corvette L98 heads , even ported ones, are pitiful, at best.
next your method of changing runner length is rather clumsy and far from ideal, from a controlled flow stand point, youll be far better off having a veriable durration valve train, and long tuneable stack type injection, keep in mind, valve timing, ignition timing, and effective compression and displacement, exhaust scavaging, are factors, that will effect the torque curve and runner length won,t have nearly the effect those factors do, Id also suggest looking into a turbo boosted combo, as youve got a huge potential for gains, rather than just a few hp or ft lbs of tq playing with intake runner length

order a catalog from these guys

http://www.kinsler.com/page--New-Products--3.html

and read thru these links

http://www.hotrocker.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_valve_timing
 
thanks grumpy. any idea how much the variable rocker setup costs, is it thousands?

has any one you know tried the setup?

looks very intriguing.
 
BEWARE of DEALS you get offered ESPECIALLY on cars that don,t run, that are offered as (it only needs a CLUTCH, OR HEAD GASKET, or NEW CAM) that screaming deal on a corvette with a blown head gasket that supposedly has a killer 383, could easily have a junk yard 305 installed that just never did run.

deals like that can be a bottomless money pit or a good deal but they are far more frequently a financial pit to be avoided

(1) you have zero proof its a 383
(2)you have no idea if the block or heads are salvageable
(3)you have no idea if the transmission or rear differential are ok
in fact you are taking the word of a stranger that it even is a 383 or ran correctly at all.
(4)If the rest of the car, (interior,electronics, suspension,paint,body etc.) look good, think it thru carefully but pay NO more for the car than you would for the same car if it came with an empty engine compartment
(5) if it was cheap to fix , and worth the effort,the current owner would have done so in 90% of the cases.
the interior and body panels and electronics could cost you thousands to repair even if the engines salvageable, so look it over as a total package, and take NOTHING the current owner says as 100% truthful

(6)yes I know your just jumping at the chance to (UPGRADE) but its FAR more likely to be a bad financial choice, if the price is low enough, that even the cost of a new drive train added to the cost of the car makes it a decent deal go ahead, but if your thinking a simple head gasket replacement , cam swap or clutch replacement will get you a running car you WOULD BE INSANELY OPTIMISTIC in MOST CASES
 
Back
Top