Building suspension links........?

61ragtop

Member
I want to replace the stock upper link in the rear of my 1961 Impala. I want to so I have an adjustable one and maybe a better design. The only company that makes one that is curved like the stock one is Hotchkis and I am looking at 300 bones to get one here. So I thought, I can weld so why not make one?

What materials are recommended to use?

If I use tube to make a tubular one can I bend it?

What ends should I use too heims joints or bushings? Maybe delum bushings like global west uses?
 
Id use heim joints , and chrome/moly tubing and heavy duty components, and grade 8 bolts, measure carefully and make very sure the brackets, and linkage rods have the correct length and geometry and are welded correctly

here is a good example of bad welding

http://rides.webshots.com/video/3026513 ... 9359WVpyxw

viewtopic.php?f=71&t=1282&p=27698&hilit=dana+60#p27698

helpful info

http://www.trucktrend.com/how-to/chassis-suspension/0804st-rear-suspension-design/

http://www.artmorrison.com/rearclip-3link.php


http://www.artmorrison.com/multi-link-IRS.php

http://phors.locost7.info/contents.htm

http://www.gmecca.com/byorc/dtipssuspension.html

http://www.fays2.net/index.html

http://www.fays2.net/fays2_watts_link_18_.html


Watts link overview paragraph:

Look closely at the axle and spring suspension set up on your leaf spring car and you'll see that it is designed similar to a back yard swing. With the leaf springs anchored at the front and back only, the axle housing is allowed to swing side to side.

Imagine what happens to the suspension geometry when you go hard into a corner or get into a threshold braking situation approaching one G with a 2800 to 3600 lb. car. The shocks, springs and tires are giving you an oversteer/understeer condition as you go through the corner. Even the best spring and shock upgrades will not be working at their maximum

The F2S Watts Link lowers your Mustang's roll center and helps keep your car's handling response symmetrical in both left and right cornering. Because the F2S Watts Link keeps the axle centered under the car, the rear of the car now "follows" the front suspension rather than fighting it.

The watts link will keep the axle centered under the car, lower your roll center and allow you to take better advantage of further suspension upgrades. Often tuners will find that a watts link will allow you to upgrade with springs and shocks that control without overloading the suspension. Don't make shocks and springs do work they werenÕt designed for.

We chose to mount the F2S Watts Link "propeller" to the chassis so the car's roll center and center of gravity do not change in relation to each other. This relationship is known as "roll couple" and has a great effect on your Mustang's handling under cornering, braking and acceleration.
Rear Leaf Spring dynamics at the subsequent effects on car handling

My comments are meant to be from the practical and simple perspective. There are volumes written to explain suspension geometry: bump steer, ackerman, scrub radius, tow-in/tow-out, camber, caster, roll center and roll couple. Most of us just want a straight forward explanation as to why we get out of control under braking, cornering and acceleration.

The problems the average reader experiences are minimized compared to a Pro-Stock or GT-1/TransAm/ALMS car, so we'll assume most of us drive the more pedestrian versions. But understanding what's happening with rear axle is the best way to fix the problem.

1. What does a rear suspension do on a rear-wheel drive car? What happens under acceleration, braking, cornering, and combinations thereof?

1) In a rear drive suspension car, the live axle effect on handling can vary from 100% to as little as 10% or less and here's why. Under hard acceleration a properly set up drag car will apply maximum weight transfer to the rear axle and in many cases lift the front wheels. In this extreme case, the rear suspension is controlling acceleration, steering and braking. A lot of work to do in a 2800 to 3800 lb Mustang. Depending on the sophistication of the suspension (stock leafs or coils, add-on traction bars, pinion snubbers, torque links, high density bushings or a complex 3-link or 4-link) the effect can be a good launch or up in smoke. As the drive shaft rotates and applies torque and horse power to the differential, multiple forces are in effect as the car begins to move forward. Immediately the tires fight for traction and with a good differential, in theory, the effect should be equal side to side. Not so. The rotating driveshaft, ring and pinion and axles apply more force (torque) to one tire than the other. This rotation also causes weight transfer from one side to the other. Plus, under acceleration, the front of the differential is being forced up cause spring wrap, and not evenly from side to side. Want more? Most likely the axle is also moving side to side. So in addition to acceleration, the rear suspension is now attempting to steer the car. All this and you're barely through the 60 ft mark. Now repeat this scenario at each hard shift and the 1/4 mile can be a real handful. The more horse power the bigger the handful. 1320 ft later you're hard on the brakes.

All of the above now acts in reverse with two important additions. Most of the carÕs weight has now transferred to the front suspension and the rear brakes are trying to lock up the tires and add more drama to the unloaded springs and shocks. Add in, reverse torque factors which are now trying to drive the pinion into the pavement and you need a handful of steering input just to keep the car in a straight line.

Now lets throw in a corner. Remember the tires can only work at 100% of their capacity and up to now the tires have only had to accelerate and brake. All of the above forces continue to apply as a car approaches a corner. When you set up the car to turn in, clip an apex and follow the proper line through the turn out, new gravitational forces come into play. Your transition from straight line acceleration, to straight line braking, then cornering (with or with out trail braking) to acceleration off the corner are putting heavy side loads on your suspension and tires.

If you suddenly need 50% or more of your tires traction to corner it leaves less than 50%, probably more like 20% or 30% for braking or acceleration. The body is trying to slide to the outside of the corner while the axle and tires fight to stay on line. Most likely you've just introduced a condition commonly known has "dog tracking" to your road racer. We've all been behind a car going down the street with the rear tires misaligned with the fronts. That's "dog tracking". And with out the proper suspension aids your car will "dog track" every time you go through a corner. Yet another way the rear axle tries to steer the car.Accelerate out of the corner and all of the forces described above regarding acceleration take over again.

The effect of the rear axle in "steering" the car cannot be overlooked if you are going to build a great handling road, track or race car. When you realize that the rear axle transmits100% of the power to the pavement, it is extremely important that the forces I described are minimized. Fortunately there are plenty of suspension add-ons available. Heavy duty springs, adjustable shocks, sway bars, traction bars, torque links, panhard bars and watts links when selected properly will change a loose and unpredictable car into a car that accelerates straight, corners predictably and stops with confidence.

2. How have Mustang rear suspensions changed over the years? The early cars are very crude, how did that evolve through the Fox, SN95 and the current generation cars?

2) The Fox bodies went to coil springs for packaging reasons and to make the ride more compliant. Quickly Ford had to add the Quad-Shock set up to control wheel hop when the HO Mustangs started making over 200 hp again. I believe the suspension evolution in the SN95 models where just that, evolution. Since the later Mustangs are very big in the drag racing scene, all the improvements where made to reduce wheel hop and improve axle control under acceleration. Built in control arms control the axle wide up under both acceleration and braking and the aftermarket is flooded with upgrades.

I've driven stock SN95s and they handle and stop much better than a stock early Mustang but remember that the Mustang platform was designed in the 1950's when the Falcon was concepted. A great deal of what makes the later Mustangs stock suspension setup so much better is the built-in chassis stiffness and the front suspension design. The whole geometry of where the the shocks and springs are mounted on the control arms, steering box location and built in camber and caster angles deserve itÕs own article. Everyone knows the late models work better but the reasons are not always clear with out diagrams and suspension theories to explain why it works.

3. What are the drawbacks and benefits of a live axle? Why don't Mustangs have IRS?

3) The question of why Ford doesnÕt fit all V8 Mustangs with a IRS has been around since rumors of an IRS for the 1965 chassis. In my opinion the answer is quite simple: Cost. The Corvette has had an IRS since the 60s and many high end sports cars have had them forever so there must be an advantage. There is. First off, most of the inherent problems with a live axle car are eliminated with an IRS. Because the differential is mounted to the chassis, side to side movement of the axle and many of the related problems are eliminated. The differential transmits the power to the wheels through half shafts to the axle spindles. Because the suspension now has to control only the wheel hub, axle bearing components, wheel and the tire the unsprung weight is greatly reduced. Unsprung weight consists of all the drive line components the springs and shocks have to control. The goal in road racing is to reduce unsprung weight. The less unsprung weight the more control the springs and shocks have in keeping the tires firmly glued to the pavement. Light weight wheels are important in road racing for this very reason.

With an IRS, the axles swing on an arch with the differential being the pivot point. As the car goes through a corner and the body rolls, the tires are able to maintain a flatter contact with the pavement. In a live axle chassis, the tires remain parallel to each other. What you want ideally is for each tire to find it's own best contact angle. The IRS has a big advantage in this area. One more advantage the an IRS has over a live axle is a softer and more compliant ride, although this issue is more important in a luxury ride than a corner carver. But IRS suspensions are not without their own unique problems. They are by their very design more complicated and therefore more expensive. Most IRS suspension will have continuing Camber, caster and toe-in changes as the suspension moves through its travel range.

The axle shaft in a live axle set up is replaced by a half shaft with two u-joints; maintenance and breakage potential. Because the wheel is pivoting on the end of a half shaft additional parts are need to keep the wheels aligned properly. The rear suspension can be out of alignment similar to the front and this alignment can be a source of handling nightmares when it goes out.You could have a situation where the rear is steering left and the front is steering right. Most of us can dial in a live axle rear suspension much much easier than an IRS and this alone is a vote for the live axle. Keep in mind that the incredibly fast GT1 and Trans Am cars run live axle suspensions.

In a drag racing environment the live axle is king. From Top Fuel to pro Stock to bracket racing live axles are used because they are stronger (less parts to break) and they are tunable for weight transfer. Since many of the Mustang owners are into drag racing the IRS would offer no advantage. This is not to say that the IRS won't work on the drag strip but it certainly is at a disadvantage.

Because of manufacturing costs, over 50% of the Mustangs sold are 6 cylinder automatics, the IRS is just not justifiable on a production line car. The Cobra Mustangs sold with IRS have certainly shown well for themselves but the owners paid a dollar premium and on any track day you will see live axle cars running as fast or faster than the IRS Mustangs. With properly selected suspension components: springs, shocks, bushings, panhard bar or watts link, the live axle car will corner with complete confidence and control.

4. What influence do tires and wheels have on rear suspension tuning? What about tire pressures?

4) Tires and wheels are the number one area for unsprung weight reduction. The lighter the wheel and tire combination the more control the springs and shocks can excerpt in keeping the tire planted firmly on the track. Wider wheels will help spread the tires contact patch and must be matched to the tire manufacturers recommendation. Too narrow a wheel width can cause the tire to roll over in a corner. Two wide a wheel can prevent the tires full contact across the surface. Both situations on the rear axle can contribute to oversteer.

Wider wheels are often used on the rear because the rear tires are a bigger size than the front. The wider and taller tires provided a better bite on acceleration and more control on a cornering situation. With most Mustangs having more weight on the front axle than the rear axle it would seem that the bigger tire should go up front. But because the front suspension design and adjustments allow the tires to do a better job in cornering forces than the rears the smaller tires can work well in controlling the braking and cornering forces.

The rear tires have a much different job to do than the fronts and as such their height, tread width and cross section widths need to be greater. Braking, cornering and acceleration all put unique demands on the rear suspension. Under hard braking weight transfer takes weight off the rear axle. Because rear braking is extremely important in car control the wider rear tires put more rubber on the pavement and help counter act weight transfer braking effects, and the car stops with more control. Going through the corner, momentum affects the rear like a pendulum and wants to swing the 45% to 50% of a front drive cars rear weight around. The more rubber on the back axle, the less pendulum effect. Acceleration off the corner requires good bite and here again the wider, bigger tire is necessary to lower lap times.

Tires are the what keep you on the track. After all the suspension tuning has been applied and the driving schools paid for it still comes down to four tires transmitting all the information from the pavement to the driver. When you watch a NASCAR race and hear the the crew chief is taking one pound of air out of a corner it's not because the portable air tank is running low. Tire tuning is probably the most overlooked area of suspension tuning in a trackday or road race car. Probably because it requires back to back testing and detailed notes. Its easier to put 30 lbs in the front and 26 in the back and just go out and drive hard and have fun. In an autocross event, tire pressure effects can be easier to monitor and can make a big difference. Taking a pound or three out of a rear tire can help make the rear suspension softer, induce some oversteer and help transition the car through a tight apex.

Every car and every driving style will react differently but do not over look how variations in the tire pressure will affect your cars handling. Two measurement are very important when tuning tires for handling. Accurately recording the pressure before you go out on the track and when you come in for a pit stop or finish your session can tell you a lot about your chassis set up. Ideally you would like all four tires to gain the same amount of pressure. If the fronts are gaining considerably more pressure the the rears, you are probably experiencing a great deal of push or understeer. Conversely if the rears are heating up much more than the fronts you are probably fighting a loose or oversteering car.

Contrary to what you make think, a tire pressure gauge is not the only tool for monitoring tire performance. A tire pyrometer can give you a tremendous amount of information. Taking the temperature across the surface will tell you if the pressure is high or low. A higher temperature in the center of the tread than the outsides indicates too much pressure and vice versa. Higher temperature on the outside of a rear tire indicates an oversteer problem. Higher temperature on the outside of a front tire indicates an understeer problem. Here is where a stable rear suspension can help. A watts link will keep the axle centered under the car, lower the cars roll center and prevent excessive weight transfer in a corner. Never underestimate what tire tuning and monitoring can do to improve handling.

5. What influence do shock and spring rates have on tuning handling?

6. How does the front suspension interact with the rear? For example, how does a softly sprung front affect the rear?

7. What are the differences in tuning of the rear suspension for a road racer versus a drag racer?

5, 6 & 7) Shocks and spring can be the most complicated suspension pieces on a race suspension. Check out a professional race car hauler and youÕll find a big selection of springs and shocks. Every professional race team now has a shock dyno to properly tune for compression and rebound. If you can afford it, purchase single or double adjustable shocks and ask around to see what your competition is having good results with.

A giant myth is that stiffer is always better. Both springs and shocks need to CONTROL the car not "shock" the handling. Most owners of street cars will decide to improve their stock suspensions with stiffer springs and shocks. Race cars have firm suspensions so the firmer the better, right? Not always. Remember that handling is about control. The idea is to have the suspension controlling car movement while the tires stay in contact with the pavement. I like to look to other types of racing for inspiration and ideas. Off-roaders race over the most demanding terrain in racing. Even though the road race track is smooth in comparison, it still has bumps, elevation changes, stones, debris and expansion cracks we have to deal with. Current off-road technology features soft long travel suspensions with multiple shocks to control without "shocking" the vehicle. They've learned it's all about controlling the race car and letting the tires do their job.

Start your suspension modifications by addressing the primary problem. In most live axle, rear drive suspensions, the axles lateral movement is not properly controlled. If you have a factory panhard bar, replace the bushings with firmer aftermarket pieces. Better yet, replace the panhard bar with a watts link.

If you do not have a panhard bar, start with a watts link. The watts link will keep the axle centered under the car, lower your roll center and allow you to take better advantage of further suspension upgrades. Often tuners will find that a watts link will allow you to upgrade with springs and shocks that control without overloading the suspension. Don't make shocks and springs do work they weren't designed for.
Shock tuning and spring rates can dial in understeer, oversteer or neutral handling. Softening the rear rates can often induce more oversteer for better turn in but too much and youÕll also have oversteer coming out of the corner. Every car will react differently because of weight distribution, tire compound and driving style. But remember that tuning does not always mean stiffening.

Shock valving can have a dramatic effect on car attitude and handling. Soft compression shocks on the front of a car and soft rebound on the rear will allow more and quicker weight transfer under braking. When you take weight off the rear axle it can lead to over steer and increased rotation in a corner. Good if you need more help in getting the car turned, bad if you all ready have oversteer. The same shock set up can help by keeping the front of the car tight to the track. This can help with aerodynamics and top speed on a long fast track. Spring and shock rates will also affect chassis roll which can help or hinder cornering. Soft compression shocks will allow quicker weight transfer from side to side and a firmer compression will help slow weight transfer. Ultimately the springs will limit the amount of body lean but the shocks will dampen the rate at which it occurs and help tune the chassis.

Drag racers have different but equally challenging objectives. Study a current day pro-stock suspension set up and you'll see it's designed to do an awful lot in just 1320 ft.. Drag racers deal with acceleration, straight line control and to a much less extent stopping. The rear suspension in a drag car has to control huge amounts of torque and horsepower applied instantly to the axle and tires. Traction bar devices will control axle rotation and properly valved shocks will allow the car to apply as much weight as possible to the tires. The tires in a drag car will also suffer from the old "wheel hop" dilemma. The shocks need to keep the tires planted on the stirp, allow the chassis to settle and the help keep the car straight at well over 100 mph.

Front springs and shocks will allow the weight to transfer and then let the cars front end quickly settle down on the track for maximum aerodynamics and top speed. Shock valving is as important here as it is on a NASCAR track or ALMS course only in a different way. It is obvious the drag race suspension technology has come a long way since the old "gasser stance". Stiff rear leaf springs and I-beam front ends limit top speed and braking but only look great if your at a vintage drag race.

Rear suspension in a road race or track day car has different objectives than a drag car but some theories still apply. The acceleration loads are not as great or at least they shouldnÕt be. If you launch your road racer so hard that you suffer a great deal of wheel hop you probably need a driving school. Car control in the road racer is necessary under acceleration, braking and cornering and often two out of the three at the same time. I've discussed how the live rear axle forces affect the road racer and drag racer earlier.

The most important point to keep in mind is to make changes to your suspension one at a time, keep notes on the results and always go for less than more.

Edited by ColdwaterHotrod, 26 October 2007 - 11:41 AM.

http://www.roadsters.com/chassis/

http://www.ruffstuffspecialties.com/catalog/

http://www.amazon.com/Competition-Car-S ... 185960644X

viewtopic.php?f=71&t=1198&hilit=+link

http://www.musclemustangfastfords.com/t ... index.html

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images ... 55&s=books

viewtopic.php?f=61&t=2029

http://www.performancemarketplace.com/suspens.htm

http://home.foothilloffroad.com/4link.jsp

http://www.charlotterod.com/suspension_components.htm

http://www.race-cars.net/cgi-bin/db2.pl ... ion__4Link

http://www.4wheelparts.com/subcategory. ... subCat=399

http://www.qscomponents.com/

Id add that knowing how to read plugs and tune is mandatory, and use of a quality return style fuel pressure regulator and an # 6-8 lines and a fuel cell is a huge help, and road racing is mostly about power to weight,a stiff roll cage,the correct tires, a low centrally located center of mass, big brakes, effective cooling and properly set up suspension, not max peak power
a really light weight car, with huge effective brakes, and a stiff roll cage, the good tires etc can do well against cars without those factors that have far more horsepower

viewtopic.php?f=44&t=773

viewtopic.php?f=63&t=1755&p=4431&hilit=+suspension#p4431

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=1961

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=733&p=6470&hilit=fuel+cell#p6470

http://www.jegs.com/p/Barry-Grant/Demon ... 0/10002/-1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.millerwelds.com/resources/ar ... cle96.html

http://autoweldchassis.com/rcinstruct.ivnu

http://shdesigns.org/Welding/gasmix.shtml

http://www.mig-welding.co.uk/welding-gas.htm

http://www.rollcagecomponents.com/kits2.htm

http://www.jegs.com/instructions/555/rollcage.pdf

http://www.competitionengineering.com/c ... 0_inst.pdf


IF I was designing, my own CAL TRAC BARS,

viewtopic.php?f=71&t=216&p=7850&hilit=+cal+trac#p7850

it ID be using 1" or larger DIAM ,1/8" wall thickness MINIMUM chrome moly tubing and a MATCHED grade 8 OR BETTER, HEIM JOINTS and GUSSET the intersecting joints, and use a TIG WELDER

http://www.onlinemetals.com/merchant.cf ... &top_cat=0

heim1.jpg

http://hirschmannusa.thomasnet.com/item ... read/smc20?

viewtopic.php?f=71&t=1755&p=4427&hilit=heim#p4427
cross_member.jpg


TO PREVENT SILLY STUFF LIKE THIS...WATCH THE VIDEO
http://rides.webshots.com/video/3026513 ... 9359WVpyxw
 
Want to know about swapping out a rear end and what to use
Here are some points to ponder

By: Jim Forbes

The 82-newer Camaros are wider than the older ones, so you should stick with the 70-81 models. The 75-79 Nova uses the same rear as these older Camaros, I believe. The 68-74 Nova chassis is the same as a 67-69 Camaro; the 75-79 Nova chassis is the same as the 70-81 Camaro. The 82-newer Camaros used the small 7.5" rearend design that the 78-newer Malibu/Monte Carlo/regal/cutlass etc used, but it's quite a bit wider. Some of the 82-newer Camaros used different rearends, such as the Dana 44, and some weird Australian rear end. Of course, if you want to make sure, get out your tape measure and check yourself! I may be wrong

Here's another one from Jim on the subject---- There are lots of rear ends available! Some fit better than others. For 6 lug rear ends, the 64-69 1/2 ton 2wd Chevy (and some GMC) trucks have a 12 bolt rear, about 60-61" wide (I measure them where the wheels bolt on). The 70 2wd and 70-81 4wd have a 6 lug 12 bolt that is a couple inches wider, but will fit under a Task Force truck as long as you don't get too wild with wheel/tire width. The 12 bolt truck rearends from the 60s usually had 3.70 gears, which is a bit much for extended highway driving at 75 mph. You can swap the differential carrier and ring/pinion gears from a later TRUCK or VAN 12 bolt, the 70s trucks usually had 3.08 or 3.40 gears. Of course, you'll need to know how to set up ring/pinion gears, bearing preload, and all that other neat stuff to do this. These 60s truck 12 bolt rear ends are from coil spring trucks, so the perches are in the wrong place, and they have some extra stuff on the housing for a panhard bar, which you won't need with leaf springs. Most 60s GMC trucks, and some Chevys, had Dana 44 or Dana 60 rear ends, and leaf springs. These rear ends are 6 lug, about 60" wide, and will bolt into a Task Force truck (with some fudging, the perches are about 1/2" too far apart). The brakes use different parking brake cables, which is a problem, and the drums have a different offset. Gear ratios range from 3.21 to 3.92 normally, the 3.21 is found behind some GMC V-6 engines, and is a nice ratio for an oletruck. The Dana 44 uses a standard Chevy 1310 yoke, but the Dana 60 uses a heavy duty yoke, which takes a larger 1350 series ujoint. A similar Dana 40 rear end was available as an option in 59 Chevy trucks, equipped with positraction...rare, and with a 3.92 ratio. I have one of these rearends, it was in my extended cab truck...I'm saving it for when I build a race truck (one of these years). The 71 and newer 2wd trucks use a 5 lug 5" bolt pattern, same as the 71-76 full size cars. There is not much available in the way of matching front brake rotors that will fit an old truck, so this rearend is not too popular a swap, unless you get the 70-up 4wd 6 lug axles. Chevy also used 10 bolt rear ends in lots of cars, in varying widths. A common one is the 61" wide 70s vintage Camaro/Chevelle/Nova (and clones) 8.5" rear end. In Camaros/Novas it has leaf springs, but the perches won't work with old truck springs. In Chevelles, it has coil springs, with lots of extra brackets to cut off, and the cast in mounting "eyes" on top, where the upper control arm bushings fit. Wheel bolt pattern is 4.75", and there are front disk brake kits available to match, or you can use the 53-54 car front hubs/drums on the original 50s truck brakes, to get the same bolt pattern front/rear. This is a good rear end for using in an old truck, the ratios are commonly 2.73-3.36, with higher gears available. The axle shafts are usually worn out in these things, so check them (pull the cover, lock pin, and C clips out to get them loose) where they ride in the wheel bearings...before buying the rear end! The 55-57 Chevy car rear end is almost a bolt in, the perches need to be relocated to the top of the housing though. It has the 4.75" bolt pattern, and ratios are usually 3.55-3.73, but sometimes you'll find a 3.36. The 78-88 mid size GM cars use a 7.5" 10 bolt, which is about 58/5" wide. This rear end would work well in an early (older than 47) truck, but it is quite light duty. Ratios are usually 2.29-3.23, which means you want some torque in the engine to pull it...but rpm will be low. This is a coil spring rear end, with all the mounting brackets that need to be cut off. The Ford 8" and 9" rear ends come in a whole bunch of varieties, and only a few are useful in oletrucks. The late 50s full size cars have a nice one, but it's not easy to find brake hardware, drum, etc anymore. The mid 60s midsize cars, such as the Fairlane, have a rear end that is about the right width, and would be a good candidate...if you can find one. The Maverick/Granada is very narrow, about 56.5", and would not fit anything but a very early truck, or perhaps a tubbed Pro Street truck. The 60s full size Ford car rear ends are usually too wide, but if you find one, measure it and see! Most earlier full size, and all mid size, cars use the 4.5" bolt pattern, while later full size cars use the 5" pattern. The Ford trucks have a big 5 on 5.5" pattern, with a big center that takes some work to re-drill to anything Chevy. Ratios range from 2.47 to 4.30, and the axles come in 28 or 31 spline varieties. There is lots of interchange possible with the 9" rear end, which is why it's so popular...I have one in my 55 Belair, and in my 57 Suburban chassis. Unfortunately, they are getting expensive, especially when you have to shop around for just the right one that will fit. So...if you don't know if a rear end will fit, or what it came from, get out your tape measure and see for yourself! The most important things are overall width, and wheel bolt pattern...then concern yourself with ratio. I like a 2.75-3.0 ratio for a V-8 powered truck that will spend lots of time on the highway; about 3.2-3.7 for a 6 cylinder or small V-8 for in town and limited highway use, and the stock 3.9-4.56 ratio is great if you have to use your truck to haul lotsa weight, and you don't have much engine...just don't plan on going much faster than 55!
reading links and sub linked info may not be fun,
but you may be amazed at the amount of wasted time and money,
you can save from being wasted with the info gained in the process
you may not find the link you need, specifically,
but the info you do read, should make you think,
and question the process, ask the related questions,
and look at all your options carefully.
and yes if your installing a suspension, measure accurately several times..
assume nothing is correct until its carefully verified several times,
and yes your very likely to make mistakes,
so Id suggest you measure with the suspension and tires sitting on the ground,
before, you decide on tires, clearances , Finnish welding of the suspension links , spring perches, drive shaft angles etc. are finalized/ begins


http://garage.grumpysperformance.co...asuring-for-a-new-drive-shaft.478/#post-67321

http://garage.grumpysperformance.co...ear-axles-and-differentials.11848/#post-73266

http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/getting-a-camaro-or-firebird-to-bite.4067/

http://garage.grumpysperformance.co...c4-corvette-wheel-tech-info.12099/#post-75335

http://garage.grumpysperformance.co...nks-that-may-help-your-musclecar-handle.3526/

http://garage.grumpysperformance.co...ouve-got-a-camaro-nova-etc-this-may-help.460/

http://garage.grumpysperformance.co...-and-info-to-help-get-the-chassis-right.9012/

http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/suspension-springs.5622/

http://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/disc-brake-kits.6579/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top