ILLINOIS RULING ON SEMI AUTO FIREARMS 95 PAGE RULING

Grumpy

The Grumpy Grease Monkey mechanical engineer.
Staff member

THE 7TH CIRCUIT IS ,
almost totally anti (against) civilian firearm and magazine ownership
they are making it up as they go along, as they want the power to regulate and prohibit,
civilian ownership and are in total
opposition to,(against) civilian firearm and magazine ownership
the traditional second amendment interpretation does not please the elites,
so they decide to ignore its implications and historic values
( the elites know, you can't force the masses to do unpopular things,

or force the population to accept forced "RE-EDUCATION"
(POPULAR
COMMUNIST PHRASE,
FOR ELIMINATING POLITICAL OPPONENTS WITHOUT A TRACE)
if they are armed)

restricting the rights of the vast majority of law abiding citizens
just empowers the criminals who have no intention of following any laws


obviously this is headed to the SCOTUS
 
Last edited:


the situations constantly in flux,
this makes the case far more likely to go MUCH MORE
DIRECTLY AND MUCH MORE RAPIDLY to the SCOTUS

the obvious goal is severe ownership
restrictions ,registration lists on owners, on both ammo and firearms ownership
and obviously eventual confiscation, (or why would they bother)
 
Last edited:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
 
Last edited:




police / and sheriffs logically and correctly refuse to confiscate firearms,
knowing its both unconstitutional, and highly likely to result in violent confrontations
where innocent party's on both sides of the confrontation may get hurt or worse.


second amendment
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Fourth Amendment​

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
 
Last edited:

politics-dirty_politics-political_career-politician-corruption-corrupted-hscn1183_low.jpg
politics-war-civil_liberties-illegal_search-warrant-fisa-EC264709_low.jpg


 
Last edited:





dems true goal is total civilian disarmament ,
achieved in constant & ever
repetitive small steps
until the second amendments meaningless
 
Last edited:


now illinois proposes a BILL that would result from ,
failure to turn in your FOID card and GUNS results in.

(no foid card and you can't own guns)
you losing your drivers licence!
LIB DEMS throwing a TEMPER TANTRUM ,
AFTER LESS THAN 2% OF THE POPULATION registered their guns,
embarrassing the dems plans for illinois civilians forced to
registered their guns so they could be confiscated!


obviously ALL NOT CONSTITUTIONAL!
REMEMBER DEMOCRAT GOALS,
using their math,
REGISTRATION,

PLUS TIME
EQUALS.... CONFISCATION

after all you can't allow mear citizens to hold anything like the power,

or ability to obstruct delay or ignore liberal government mandates
 
Last edited:

having had only Less than 2% of the predicted people owning firearms
in
Illinois, register them made the DEMS CRAZY


REMEMBER DEMOCRAT GOALS,
using their math,
REGISTRATION,

PLUS TIME
EQUALS.... CONFISCATION

after all you can't allow mear citizens to hold anything like the power,

or ability to obstruct delay or ignore liberal government mandates
 

WITH 20-40 MILLION MINIMUM< SEMI AUTO RIFLES IN COMMON CIVILIAN USE!
as of 2020,the government says there's a minimum of 28 million ar15 and ak rifles alone:like: so "in common use" is assured
add dozens of other rifles listed, and your minimum of 40-50 million rifles in civilian hands.
is a absurdly low estimate for u.s, civilian ownership having been sold in just the last 30 years
this as always was obviously going to happen as the result of ,
the liberal democrat political elites, overreach..

the dem elite live in a fantasy world where their mandates are considered law
they all believe they have the power of KINGS in their minds..
voters exist only to pay taxes and follow their wishes

since they had less than 2% of the firearms owners
register their weapons,
because,
the governor of ILLINOIS has repeatedly threatened to call an EMERGENCY,
anytime there's a mass shooting, to then justify his GOAL and confiscate all semi-auto rifles.
SB-2720 (not yet LAW) would force you to turn over your FOID card and guns or lose your drivers licence
you can't make AND ENFORCE obviously unconstitutional laws,

that make millions of the civilian population in your state into felons , :facepalm:

without huge legal and political consequences:facepalm::worried:




 
Last edited:
map-showing-counties-reaction-to-assault-weapon-ban-v0-xn4o4s2udwba1.png


COUNTIES IN GREEN HAVE SHERIFFS THAT SAY THEY WILL NOT ENFORCE UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS
less than 2% of gun owners registered the guns the DEMS want confiscated, knowing DEMOCRAT PLANS ment eventual CONFISCATION,
so in effect only chicago and the metroplex under strict DEMOCRAT political control will enforce the dems UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW,

these democrat elite guys wanting to secure power , through civilian disarmament,
just don't remember HISTORY
IF YOU REMEMBER YOUR HISTORY, WHAT TRIGGERED THE REVOLUTION
it was the BRITISH marching on CONCORD and LEXINGTON to confiscate ,
the ALL the colonist's POWDER,SHOT and personal weapons

the last time the government elite, minority decided to send people (law enforcement)
to disarm the majority of the
civilians......
at LEXINGTON AND CONCORD...
things rapidly went badly for those red coats task with collecting arms from
civilians

Total losses were British 273, American 95. The Battles of Lexington and Concord confirmed the alienation between the majority of colonists and the mother country, and it roused 16,000 New Englanders to join forces and begin the Siege of Boston, resulting in its evacuation by the British the following March.
 
Last edited:



watch this video below carefully
DEMS in ILLINOIS want to revoke your FOID and drivers licence,

forcing people to turn in all their guns if they SUSPECT or know,
you have a gun they don't approve of (THIS WEEK)




REMEMBER DEMOCRAT GOALS,
using their math,
REGISTRATION,

PLUS TIME
EQUALS.... CONFISCATION
 
Last edited:
map-showing-counties-reaction-to-assault-weapon-ban-v0-xn4o4s2udwba1.png


COUNTIES IN GREEN ON THE ILLINOIS MAP ABOVE,
HAVE SHERIFFS THAT SAY THEY WILL NOT ENFORCE UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS
less than 2% of gun owners registered the guns the DEMS want confiscated,

knowing DEMOCRAT PLANS ment eventual CONFISCATION,
so in effect only chicago and the metroplex under strict DEMOCRAT political control,

will enforce the dems UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW,

politically this law is screwing up, as the vast majority of people and Illinois sheriffs,
told the dems wanting gun confiscation data, you can go pound sand up your arse

 
Last edited:

whats your thoughts gentlemen??
Sheriffs-rejection-of-gun-control-map-1-13-23-544x1024.jpg
 
Last edited:




ILLINOIS POLITICAL ELITE'S GOAL, has always been to forbid or hugely restrict civilians firearm ownership
and they feel the ever expanding but incremental route, to ever stricter mandates is the way to do it!

but the SCOTUS is most likely not going to take ILLINOIS politicians telling them to "pound sand".... WELL :facepalm: :giggle: RATHER BADLY
 
Last edited:
Back
Top