duntov 30 30 cam replacement
"hey grumpy? I want to build something similar to the old 302 Z28 engine with a 327 fuelie engine I just picked up that has 11:1 pistons and fuelie heads from a old semi wrecked corvette thats been in storage for 40 plus years, naturally Ill tear it down and put in new rings and bearings ETC.but I was wondering about that old dontov cam? any tips?
old school fuelie and z28 cams
buying out dated fuelie heads with todays increased tech aftermarket heads available if max performance is your goal is a bad joke, as you can easily put $1200 into machine work and porting and not come close to some of the better current aluminum aftermarket head flow levels
these were great heads back in the 1960s but current design and testing technology has far surpassed that flow and power level nearly 60 years after they were originally used.
http://sallee-chevrolet.com/Cylinder_Heads/Vortec.html
http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/en...-1003-classic-chevy-small-block-dyno-testing/
Standard 302 (30-30) cam, P/N 3849346
Casting #3849347
254 duration @ .050" (intake & exhaust)
.485" lift (with 1.5 rockers)
114 deg. lobe separation
Exhaust Max lift @ 116 deg. BTDC
Intake Max lift @ 112 deg. ATDC
First Design Off-Road cam, P/N 3927140
Casting #3927141
Intake 257 duration @ .050" (333 advertised)
Exh. 269 duration @ .050" (346 advertised)
Lift: .493" intake, .512" exhaust
Intake Max lift @ 108 deg. ATDC
Exhaust Max lift @ 116 deg. BTDC
2nd Design Off-Road cam, P/N 3965754
Casting #3965751
Intake 248 duration (324 advertised)
Exh. 267 duration (334 advertised)
Lift: .512" intake, .535" exhaust
a cam will open the valves , and in large part control how far they open and how long and where in the rpm range, but its the heads and intake and headers that have the most effect on air flow rates,
the best cam in the world won,t do much if those components are not well matched to the displacement and compression and drive train gearing.
FUELIE HEADS
DART HEADS
CHEVY 882 smogger heads
VORTEC HEADS
rhs heads
we would need a good deal more info,to give you a good idea what would be about ideal.. but just a bit of info you might find of interest, the old Z28 302 engines tended to run really well with the crane 114681 flat tappet solid lifter cam if they had 3.90-4.11 rear gears and a muncie trans. Id point out that the old FUELIE cam, your referring to is a nearly 60 year old flat tappet design and as in most 60 year old designs, theres been significant improvements in related technology in that time making the older design far from current or nearly as effective as some newer designs.
yes even back in the 1980s crane and crower had much more efficient flat tappet cam designs
Id also point out that computers have made the design of the newer roller cam designs far more efficient than that older flat tappet lifter cam design.
that cam swap back in the day made the cars noticeable more responsive, but that was when SUNOCO 260 was 40 cents a gallon also
your best plan would be to make a real detailed list of all your engine and drive train info and call at least 7 cam companys
http://www.cranecams.com/product/cart.p ... il&p=24424
http://www.cranecams.com/product/cart.p ... il&p=23891
read these links, it will save you time and money
http://forum.grumpysperformance.com/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=4463&p=11732&hilit=crossram#p11732
http://www.camaros.org/302valves.shtml
viewtopic.php?f=52&t=82
viewtopic.php?f=52&t=181
viewtopic.php?f=44&t=2099&p=17024&hilit=fuelie+heads#p17024
viewtopic.php?f=44&t=4463&p=11732&hilit=crossram#p11732
viewtopic.php?f=55&t=3431&p=9088&hilit=crossram#p9088
"hey grumpy? I want to build something similar to the old 302 Z28 engine with a 327 fuelie engine I just picked up that has 11:1 pistons and fuelie heads from a old semi wrecked corvette thats been in storage for 40 plus years, naturally Ill tear it down and put in new rings and bearings ETC.but I was wondering about that old dontov cam? any tips?
old school fuelie and z28 cams

buying out dated fuelie heads with todays increased tech aftermarket heads available if max performance is your goal is a bad joke, as you can easily put $1200 into machine work and porting and not come close to some of the better current aluminum aftermarket head flow levels


these were great heads back in the 1960s but current design and testing technology has far surpassed that flow and power level nearly 60 years after they were originally used.

http://sallee-chevrolet.com/Cylinder_Heads/Vortec.html


http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/en...-1003-classic-chevy-small-block-dyno-testing/
Standard 302 (30-30) cam, P/N 3849346
Casting #3849347
254 duration @ .050" (intake & exhaust)
.485" lift (with 1.5 rockers)
114 deg. lobe separation
Exhaust Max lift @ 116 deg. BTDC
Intake Max lift @ 112 deg. ATDC
First Design Off-Road cam, P/N 3927140
Casting #3927141
Intake 257 duration @ .050" (333 advertised)
Exh. 269 duration @ .050" (346 advertised)
Lift: .493" intake, .512" exhaust
Intake Max lift @ 108 deg. ATDC
Exhaust Max lift @ 116 deg. BTDC
2nd Design Off-Road cam, P/N 3965754
Casting #3965751
Intake 248 duration (324 advertised)
Exh. 267 duration (334 advertised)
Lift: .512" intake, .535" exhaust
a cam will open the valves , and in large part control how far they open and how long and where in the rpm range, but its the heads and intake and headers that have the most effect on air flow rates,
the best cam in the world won,t do much if those components are not well matched to the displacement and compression and drive train gearing.
FUELIE HEADS


DART HEADS

CHEVY 882 smogger heads


rhs heads

we would need a good deal more info,to give you a good idea what would be about ideal.. but just a bit of info you might find of interest, the old Z28 302 engines tended to run really well with the crane 114681 flat tappet solid lifter cam if they had 3.90-4.11 rear gears and a muncie trans. Id point out that the old FUELIE cam, your referring to is a nearly 60 year old flat tappet design and as in most 60 year old designs, theres been significant improvements in related technology in that time making the older design far from current or nearly as effective as some newer designs.
yes even back in the 1980s crane and crower had much more efficient flat tappet cam designs
Id also point out that computers have made the design of the newer roller cam designs far more efficient than that older flat tappet lifter cam design.
that cam swap back in the day made the cars noticeable more responsive, but that was when SUNOCO 260 was 40 cents a gallon also
your best plan would be to make a real detailed list of all your engine and drive train info and call at least 7 cam companys
http://www.cranecams.com/product/cart.p ... il&p=24424
http://www.cranecams.com/product/cart.p ... il&p=23891
read these links, it will save you time and money
http://forum.grumpysperformance.com/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=4463&p=11732&hilit=crossram#p11732
http://www.camaros.org/302valves.shtml
viewtopic.php?f=52&t=82
viewtopic.php?f=52&t=181
viewtopic.php?f=44&t=2099&p=17024&hilit=fuelie+heads#p17024
viewtopic.php?f=44&t=4463&p=11732&hilit=crossram#p11732
viewtopic.php?f=55&t=3431&p=9088&hilit=crossram#p9088
Last edited by a moderator: