Id point out right up front, that we all, have preferences based on our personal experience's
and
it's a fact that most centerfire cartridges used by a consistently accurate shot, with good ammo at reasonable ranges by a hunter,
who understands a cartridges limitation's,
can make a rifle so chambered work well, in most areas.
but there are basic ballistic and physics standards ,we all need to judge our choices by,
choices made in reliability, carry weight, fit, function, consistent ,repeatable accuracy,
and physical laws that govern and effect getting consistent results.
and obviously the terrain and average distances you can see or get a shot at game has a huge effect on valid options
having a decent amount of power ( impact energy and penetration)and a reasonably flat trajectory are benefits ,
but the area you hunt and the game hunted may not require you to maximize either characteristic.
understand there's a huge difference between what might prove lethal WHEN USED in skilled hands,
with perfect shot placement,
and what works almost every time with a decent shot made by your average hunter.
when I started out hunting ELK over 60 years ago my mentors were convinced that a 30/06 with a 220 grain round nose bullet was ideal.
(it worked well then and continues to work now in skilled hands in the area we hunt where shots over 250 yards are very rare.)
Id also point out that by far the two most popular rifle & cartridge combos
being used in our group of experienced hunters, are the Remington 7600 in 35 Whelan loaded with a SPEER 250 grain bullet at about 2500 FPS and the BROWNING 358 win BLR loaded with that same SPEER 250 grain bullet loaded to about 2275 FPS
most of these discussions are rather pointless, most people use what they have,
and are not likely to do the real research required to buy the best and most effective option,
KEEP in mind, its the skill of the user and his knowledge ,and acceptance of,
of each rifles accuracy and the user fully understanding the rifles,
range limitations, and the projectile selected,
rather than the cartridge that makes or breaks the combos effective use!
check the used gun rack at many gun-shops,
there are occasionally bargains to be had in ,
older high quality rifles,
that spent far more time in a gun safe,
than out hunting.
ON EACH AND EVERY ELK PHOTO, YOU WOULD AIM OR PLACE THE SCOPE CROSS HAIRS ABOUT 12 " HIGHER,THAN THE HEART IS SHOWN LOCATED,
THIS WOULD RESULT IN A LETHAL HIT FROM BETWEEN ABOUT 10 YARDS UP TO ABOUT 250 YARDS WITH MOST RIFLES
I get asked rather frequently what my choices in rifles and cartridges are,
and while my choice may not match yours ,
there are some basic guide lines to use!
we all have preferences in cartridges we have used successfully,
its hard to ignore physics and there are some limits to what will work,
but experience and the skill, knowledge and experience .
of the person wielding the firearm had a huge effect on the likely results.
you can certainly use something that's not even close to ideal,
and you'll get good results if you have the skill's, and experience to compensate,
for your rifles lack of range or accuracy or penetration,
and you use those skills to compensate by getting in close to shoot.
select the area you hunt ,shorten the average ranges you shoot at,
and ,the game you choose should obviously have a big effect on the best cartridge/bullet and rifle choice,
and many people are far more concerned with recoil levels than you might imagine.
it's been my experience that shots taken , or even the opportunity, to take a shot at game,
at over 300 yards are rather rare.
cartridges like a 45/70 or 444 marlin certainly have the required power and penetration at under 150-200 yards ,
but rapidly loose the more ideal, flat trajectory much past that range,
cartridges like a 243 or 257 Roberts certainly shoot flat,
but once well past about 200 yards they are a bit low on power/penetration,
compared to other choices in common or at least available cartridges like a, 154 grain in a 280 rem,150 grain 270 win,
165 grain in a 30/06, or 308 win, or a 338/06 with a 200 grain bullet.
action type is generally based on your experience and personal preferences,
but most people prefer bolt actions, lever actions, for reliable and consistent, function,
with semi auto and pump actions and single shots ,
being a bit less popular but just as effective in skilled hands.
Id strongly suggest you select a cartridge/rifle combo that provides at least 2500-2600 fps at the muzzle,
and at least a 150 grain bullet weight minimum in a decent cartridge,
and anything over 250 grains in projectile weight seems a bit of over/kill.
in a rifle combo in a deer/elk rifle,
and ideally in a rifle that weights less than 9 lbs with a scope mounted.
the smallest bore diameter, Id suggest would be 6.5 mm,
(and yeah a friend of mine uses a 257 Roberts and 100 grain bullets to kill elk, but he won't consider taking a shot over 200 yards)
and I don't think you need anything over .358 to get the job done reliably, but several guys I know hunt with marlin 45/70 rifles.
for ease of access to ammo or reloading component availability,
easy reloading, and decent power at lower cost,
Id suggest a cartridge based on the 30/06 case ,
examples,
(but your certainly not limited too..)
270 win,
280 rem,
30/06,
338/06,
35 Whelan, and selecting bullets with a minimum of a
,240 sectional density,
and above 250 in sectional density being preferred
there's nothing in north America a consistently accurate shot,
in the hands of a good experienced hunter,
using something along those guide lines can't reliably kill,
with a single precisely placed shot using high quality bullets.
and yeah I personally prefer the Weatherby, tikka, Sako, Browning and Mauser
actions
www.youtube.com
https://www.chuckhawks.com/sd_beginners.htm#:~:text=It's calculated as follows: Sectional Density = (bullet, must increase accordingly to achieve the same penetration.
https://www.vcalc.com/equation/?uuid=951b9e0f-4057-11e3-83ad-bc764e049c3d
https://www.hornady.com/team-hornady/ballistic-calculators/#!/
I think many people would be rather amazed to find a cartridge like a 6.5mm 147 grain bullet
pushed from something like a 6.5mm Swedish Mauser, or a 150 grain bullet from a 270 win,
(both combo's known for flat trajectory)
are not all that much flatter in trajectory ,
than a 225 grain bullet fired from a 35 Whelan,
over the first 300 yards where most game is taken,
if all three rifles have a 200 yard zero
what are your thoughts on the ideal cartridge and rifle combo.
what action type and scope would you consider ideal.
related videos
personally I prefer the 340 wby and 375 H&H over all the other cartridges ,
for hunting elk, ( as they have the flat trajectory and when properly loaded the lethality to be devastatingly effective)
,that I've used with complete confidence, for the past 5 decades
but the 300 mags, the 338 win mag, 7mm mags,358 win, 35 Whelan, 450 marlin 30/06 ,270 win 45/70 ,all with proper loads in the hands of a hunter that understands the cartridges limitations, with proper loads all have devoted followers
keep in mind the areas I hunted for 5 decades rarely allow you to even see any elk past about 250 yards due to terrain and aspen and conifer and oak brush and rolling hill terrain
I have used, those two cartridges ( 340 wby and 375 H&H, for many of my hunting trips ) ,
for 5 decades, and I'm very pleased with the results ,I have not yet needed a second shot, mostly because I won.t shoot until I'm certain of the shot placement (yes that has occasionally resulted in not taking shots I might have made)
but the cost of the magnum length actions , and use of either Weatherby mark V,
or sako actions and recoil levels, and weight of the rifles chambered in those cartridges , and the increased cost of related ammo, are reasons most people won't be purchasing similar rifles,
personally I don't feel the few extra few ounces of weight, marginally longer action length, or obviously increased recoil are too high a price to pay for the very effective results,
that pushing a 250-300 grain .338-375 caliber projectile have, as I have complete confidence in the results I've seen., which in my opinion justifies the minor "problems" many people seem to have with those choices.
to me , personal confidence in what I carry ,
and the results I've seen makes the other factors trivial at best.
and yes I'm very aware that I could more than likely have used a 35 Whelan, chambered rifle, and had very similar results,
no you certainly do not NEED that extra power and penetration potential, of a magnum
as thousands of elk are killed every year with 270 win and 30/06 power level rifles,
but it certainly does not hurt to have a bit more power and penetration either.
many guys find the 7mm & 30 cal magnums to be very effective but the quality of the bullets and of course shot placement is critical.
But I'll stick with the 338 win, 340 wby , 35 Whelan and 375 H&H over all the other larger big game cartridges
and if terrain & brush limits your shots to under 250 yards the 358 win and 450 marlin are also good options
www.youtube.com
http://garage.grumpysperformance.co...splitting-hairs-on-cartridge-selection.16404/
http://garage.grumpysperformance.co...ange-calibers-for-elk-are-not-mandatory.1275/
its much more important to your success that your very familiar with and fully understand the trajectory and range limitations of your rifle, that your very persistent and that you do research on the area and game you'll be hunting, your success far more on those factors than the cartridge head stamp
and
it's a fact that most centerfire cartridges used by a consistently accurate shot, with good ammo at reasonable ranges by a hunter,
who understands a cartridges limitation's,
can make a rifle so chambered work well, in most areas.
but there are basic ballistic and physics standards ,we all need to judge our choices by,
choices made in reliability, carry weight, fit, function, consistent ,repeatable accuracy,
and physical laws that govern and effect getting consistent results.
and obviously the terrain and average distances you can see or get a shot at game has a huge effect on valid options
having a decent amount of power ( impact energy and penetration)and a reasonably flat trajectory are benefits ,
but the area you hunt and the game hunted may not require you to maximize either characteristic.
understand there's a huge difference between what might prove lethal WHEN USED in skilled hands,
with perfect shot placement,
and what works almost every time with a decent shot made by your average hunter.
when I started out hunting ELK over 60 years ago my mentors were convinced that a 30/06 with a 220 grain round nose bullet was ideal.
(it worked well then and continues to work now in skilled hands in the area we hunt where shots over 250 yards are very rare.)
Id also point out that by far the two most popular rifle & cartridge combos
being used in our group of experienced hunters, are the Remington 7600 in 35 Whelan loaded with a SPEER 250 grain bullet at about 2500 FPS and the BROWNING 358 win BLR loaded with that same SPEER 250 grain bullet loaded to about 2275 FPS
most of these discussions are rather pointless, most people use what they have,
and are not likely to do the real research required to buy the best and most effective option,
KEEP in mind, its the skill of the user and his knowledge ,and acceptance of,
of each rifles accuracy and the user fully understanding the rifles,
range limitations, and the projectile selected,
rather than the cartridge that makes or breaks the combos effective use!
check the used gun rack at many gun-shops,
there are occasionally bargains to be had in ,
older high quality rifles,
that spent far more time in a gun safe,
than out hunting.
ON EACH AND EVERY ELK PHOTO, YOU WOULD AIM OR PLACE THE SCOPE CROSS HAIRS ABOUT 12 " HIGHER,THAN THE HEART IS SHOWN LOCATED,
THIS WOULD RESULT IN A LETHAL HIT FROM BETWEEN ABOUT 10 YARDS UP TO ABOUT 250 YARDS WITH MOST RIFLES
I get asked rather frequently what my choices in rifles and cartridges are,
and while my choice may not match yours ,
there are some basic guide lines to use!
we all have preferences in cartridges we have used successfully,
its hard to ignore physics and there are some limits to what will work,
but experience and the skill, knowledge and experience .
of the person wielding the firearm had a huge effect on the likely results.
you can certainly use something that's not even close to ideal,
and you'll get good results if you have the skill's, and experience to compensate,
for your rifles lack of range or accuracy or penetration,
and you use those skills to compensate by getting in close to shoot.
select the area you hunt ,shorten the average ranges you shoot at,
and ,the game you choose should obviously have a big effect on the best cartridge/bullet and rifle choice,
and many people are far more concerned with recoil levels than you might imagine.
it's been my experience that shots taken , or even the opportunity, to take a shot at game,
at over 300 yards are rather rare.
cartridges like a 45/70 or 444 marlin certainly have the required power and penetration at under 150-200 yards ,
but rapidly loose the more ideal, flat trajectory much past that range,
cartridges like a 243 or 257 Roberts certainly shoot flat,
but once well past about 200 yards they are a bit low on power/penetration,
compared to other choices in common or at least available cartridges like a, 154 grain in a 280 rem,150 grain 270 win,
165 grain in a 30/06, or 308 win, or a 338/06 with a 200 grain bullet.
action type is generally based on your experience and personal preferences,
but most people prefer bolt actions, lever actions, for reliable and consistent, function,
with semi auto and pump actions and single shots ,
being a bit less popular but just as effective in skilled hands.
Id strongly suggest you select a cartridge/rifle combo that provides at least 2500-2600 fps at the muzzle,
and at least a 150 grain bullet weight minimum in a decent cartridge,
and anything over 250 grains in projectile weight seems a bit of over/kill.
in a rifle combo in a deer/elk rifle,
and ideally in a rifle that weights less than 9 lbs with a scope mounted.
the smallest bore diameter, Id suggest would be 6.5 mm,
(and yeah a friend of mine uses a 257 Roberts and 100 grain bullets to kill elk, but he won't consider taking a shot over 200 yards)
and I don't think you need anything over .358 to get the job done reliably, but several guys I know hunt with marlin 45/70 rifles.
for ease of access to ammo or reloading component availability,
easy reloading, and decent power at lower cost,
Id suggest a cartridge based on the 30/06 case ,
examples,
(but your certainly not limited too..)
270 win,
280 rem,
30/06,
338/06,
35 Whelan, and selecting bullets with a minimum of a
,240 sectional density,
and above 250 in sectional density being preferred
there's nothing in north America a consistently accurate shot,
in the hands of a good experienced hunter,
using something along those guide lines can't reliably kill,
with a single precisely placed shot using high quality bullets.
and yeah I personally prefer the Weatherby, tikka, Sako, Browning and Mauser
actions
.375 Ruger vs. .375 H&H
Better ballistics? Better load options? Best .375 OVERALL? All this and more on today’s episode of the Backcountry Hunting Podcast!
https://www.vcalc.com/equation/?uuid=951b9e0f-4057-11e3-83ad-bc764e049c3d
https://www.hornady.com/team-hornady/ballistic-calculators/#!/
I think many people would be rather amazed to find a cartridge like a 6.5mm 147 grain bullet
pushed from something like a 6.5mm Swedish Mauser, or a 150 grain bullet from a 270 win,
(both combo's known for flat trajectory)
are not all that much flatter in trajectory ,
than a 225 grain bullet fired from a 35 Whelan,
over the first 300 yards where most game is taken,
if all three rifles have a 200 yard zero
what are your thoughts on the ideal cartridge and rifle combo.
what action type and scope would you consider ideal.
related videos
personally I prefer the 340 wby and 375 H&H over all the other cartridges ,
for hunting elk, ( as they have the flat trajectory and when properly loaded the lethality to be devastatingly effective)
,that I've used with complete confidence, for the past 5 decades
but the 300 mags, the 338 win mag, 7mm mags,358 win, 35 Whelan, 450 marlin 30/06 ,270 win 45/70 ,all with proper loads in the hands of a hunter that understands the cartridges limitations, with proper loads all have devoted followers
keep in mind the areas I hunted for 5 decades rarely allow you to even see any elk past about 250 yards due to terrain and aspen and conifer and oak brush and rolling hill terrain
I have used, those two cartridges ( 340 wby and 375 H&H, for many of my hunting trips ) ,
for 5 decades, and I'm very pleased with the results ,I have not yet needed a second shot, mostly because I won.t shoot until I'm certain of the shot placement (yes that has occasionally resulted in not taking shots I might have made)
now obviously this is a bit tongue in cheek,
because different areas may require different equipment,
and if you watch most videos or out door shows,
or read most hunting magazines,
you might get the idea most elk and mule deer are usually shot at long distance in open grass lands.
While this is true in some areas,
,its certainly not true for many areas I've hunted over 5 decades, most of the guys I started hunting elk with,
advised...
because different areas may require different equipment,
and if you watch most videos or out door shows,
or read most hunting magazines,
you might get the idea most elk and mule deer are usually shot at long distance in open grass lands.
While this is true in some areas,
,its certainly not true for many areas I've hunted over 5 decades, most of the guys I started hunting elk with,
advised...
- grumpyvette
- Replies: 40
- Forum: rifle related
or sako actions and recoil levels, and weight of the rifles chambered in those cartridges , and the increased cost of related ammo, are reasons most people won't be purchasing similar rifles,
personally I don't feel the few extra few ounces of weight, marginally longer action length, or obviously increased recoil are too high a price to pay for the very effective results,
that pushing a 250-300 grain .338-375 caliber projectile have, as I have complete confidence in the results I've seen., which in my opinion justifies the minor "problems" many people seem to have with those choices.
to me , personal confidence in what I carry ,
and the results I've seen makes the other factors trivial at best.
and yes I'm very aware that I could more than likely have used a 35 Whelan, chambered rifle, and had very similar results,
no you certainly do not NEED that extra power and penetration potential, of a magnum
as thousands of elk are killed every year with 270 win and 30/06 power level rifles,
but it certainly does not hurt to have a bit more power and penetration either.
many guys find the 7mm & 30 cal magnums to be very effective but the quality of the bullets and of course shot placement is critical.
But I'll stick with the 338 win, 340 wby , 35 Whelan and 375 H&H over all the other larger big game cartridges
and if terrain & brush limits your shots to under 250 yards the 358 win and 450 marlin are also good options
10 Forgotten Hunting Calibers That Are More Accurate Than Modern Calibers!
Rifle tech may evolve, but some forgotten hunting calibers still outperform today’s top choices. In this video, we explore 9 classic rounds—like the 6.5×55 S...
http://garage.grumpysperformance.co...ange-calibers-for-elk-are-not-mandatory.1275/
its much more important to your success that your very familiar with and fully understand the trajectory and range limitations of your rifle, that your very persistent and that you do research on the area and game you'll be hunting, your success far more on those factors than the cartridge head stamp
Last edited:

