Thank you Rick for good and valuable input.
I am wondering about the Hydraulic Intensity of 48, is this a high no.? As the Crower 00471 has 50, I wonder if these 2 deg. make a large difference ?.
What I can see is that the Jones cam come out at 8 i DCR and with my limited knowledge it seems that it could be a interesting choice. Would be very interested to hear if Grumpy have some comment to this cam, and if it could be a good alternative for my engine.
From what I can see the figures for advertised duration for the crane cam is at @.04", and if I have understood it correctly these figures can not be used directly into the table for dynamic compression, or am I wrong on this ? I think I read that you need to subtract some degrees to get the figure for @.06 and use this figure.
I read somewhere that a good estimate of the duration @ .006" will be 275° in and 283° ex. for this cam, but I have sent a email to Crane to check.
I also got a reply from Howard cams today and they proposed a 111145-10, which I have attached spec for.
I will check some more and hopefully learn some more on my way.
Regards
Pal
I am wondering about the Hydraulic Intensity of 48, is this a high no.? As the Crower 00471 has 50, I wonder if these 2 deg. make a large difference ?.
What I can see is that the Jones cam come out at 8 i DCR and with my limited knowledge it seems that it could be a interesting choice. Would be very interested to hear if Grumpy have some comment to this cam, and if it could be a good alternative for my engine.
From what I can see the figures for advertised duration for the crane cam is at @.04", and if I have understood it correctly these figures can not be used directly into the table for dynamic compression, or am I wrong on this ? I think I read that you need to subtract some degrees to get the figure for @.06 and use this figure.
I read somewhere that a good estimate of the duration @ .006" will be 275° in and 283° ex. for this cam, but I have sent a email to Crane to check.
I also got a reply from Howard cams today and they proposed a 111145-10, which I have attached spec for.
I will check some more and hopefully learn some more on my way.
Regards
Pal