Walde's -86 L98

Re: Walde's L98

Not a very good scan, I'm afraid.

specst.jpg
 
Re: Walde's L98

00471.jpg


not a great deal different from the Crower cam you've selected INDYCARS but Id bet the crower version in that application would make very similar or possibility slightly more mid rpm hp as its got a bit more lift, but remember different compression ratio, displacement ,heads, intakes , the port and runner length and cross sectional area and the design of the headers, and how well they scavenge,at any set rpm band, all effect the results so its not like the two engines will be virtual clones
I HAVE used that 00471 in several 383-406 sbc engines (usually but not always with 1.6:1 ratio roller rockers)and in every case it made impressive power up to about 6300 rpm
 
Re: Walde's L98

The scan is very easily readable, so no problem for me there. It's not like I'm trying to read a book.

The advertised duration is within one degree, but Crower does not state at what lift they rate this duration,
where CompCams tells us its done at 0.006". If we assume the same spec, then the "Hydraulic Intensity" is
also very close .

When looking at the duration at .050", CompCams gives the exhaust 2 more degrees. Also the valve lift of
the CompCams gives a signification nod to the exhaust with another .020" more lift, where the Crower only
adds another .005" of lift.

If the Crower was retarded 4 degrees, then the valve timing for the intakes would be identical and the exhaust
would be within one degree. The Lobe Separation Angle (LSA) would be identical and so would the
Intake Centerline Angle (ICA).

You do have better flowing heads and another 26 cubic inches to feed.




 

Attachments

  • Walde's-Cam-Comparison.jpg
    Walde's-Cam-Comparison.jpg
    71.4 KB · Views: 224
Re: Walde's L98

grumpyvette said:
not a great deal different from the Crower cam you've selected INDYCARS but Id bet the crower version in that application would make very similar or possibility slightly more mid rpm hp as its got a bit more lift, but because the CROWER is a HYDRAULIC ROLLER compared to a SOLID ROLLER COMP CAM the low and peak power might be marginally better with the COMP version because of the solid rollers different ramp acceleration of the lifter and potentially slightly more stable upper rpm valve control but only over about 6200rpm, but remember different compression ratio, displacement ,heads, intakes , the port and runner length and cross sectional area and the design of the headers, and how well they scavenge,at any set rpm band, all effect the results so its not like the two engines will be virtual clones
I HAVE used that 00471 in several 383-406 sbc engines (usually but not always with 1.6:1 ratio roller rockers)and in every case it made impressive power up to about 6300 rpm
Uh.....I think the CompCams is a Hydraulic Roller.

From the picture the manifold looks to be the same as I have, a RPM Air Gap dual plane manifold.

Walde said:
Pull in the video was run with Hooker Super Comp 1 3/4" headers, 3" collectors. We ran the initial pull with 1 5/8" headers and what's really peculiar IMHO is that max power was just 1 hp down ie. 542. TQ was a little lower but now much.

I wonder if the small difference with the larger headers is due to the increase flow from the camshaft, what do you think?

 
Re: Walde's L98

I think your correct, its a hydraulic roller, (Ill correct that post) I don,t know why I thought I remembered that grind as a solid roller?
 
Re: Walde's L98

Greetings after a lengthy hibernation or such.

Car's been sitting for two years now and haven't even touched it this year. Bought an -89 MR2 in January or so and have been having fun with that all year. Cracking little gem.

Anyway, we went into garage today and managed to do something. :idea:


p1010146bf.jpg


Plan is to change all bushings etc. on the rear lump while it is off. Probably would be good idea to change half and shaft seals, too.
 
Re: Walde's L98

Walde said:
Greetings after a lengthy hibernation or such.

Car's been sitting for two years now and haven't even touched it this year. Bought an -89 MR2 in January or so and have been having fun with that all year. Cracking little gem.

Anyway, we went into garage today and managed to do something. :idea:


p1010146bf.jpg


Plan is to change all bushings etc. on the rear lump while it is off. Probably would be good idea to change half and shaft seals, too.

Id think its a good time to change rear differential fluid and replace the U-joints if those were not recently done also
 
Re: Walde's L98

Yep, those too are on the list - have a big box of parts from Rockauto somewhere in the garage with just about each and every wearing suspension item and then some.
 
Re: Walde's L98

And now for something completely different.

I have a full set of Timken hubs waiting to be installed. Somewhere I read that "you must change the washer behing the rear hub when changing the hubs". Is this so or is the washer re-useable?

The washer is GM P/N 14076924 and according to GMPartsdirect discontinued. Should I replace it or does it matter? Is yes then where might I get them? The ones in there now are OK just a bit of coating (teflon?) is worn off.

washer.jpg
 
Re: Walde's L98

Thanks for the links. Hope somebody has them in stock.

This fell off today:

p1010152ur.jpg


Looks sort of point of no return. :mrgreen:

p1010156s.jpg
 
Re: Walde's L98

looks more like the point where you start cleaning parts , flipping thru catalogs, and getting on the phone and listening to your check book scream in agony as you cut the balance into little bloody chunks ordering parts
 
Re: Walde's L98

Note to myself: "NO...MORE...SHOPPING...ONLINE..."

Thankfully I have pretty much all parts in the garage already. Definitely some needs will pop up such as seals for trans and OD units etc. But no TKO-600, no Sir, not me...or...hmmm...er... :oops:
 
Re: Walde's L98

Right. I really should go to garage but I'm feeling lazy. The only thing that is left to correct that is to have some motivational music. For this instance I use music from epic costume drama Rocky Eins und Zwei.

Problem with Gonna Fly Now is that when you plan to go to the garage you get the urge to drink five raw eggs and go running. :shock:

Bill Conti: Gonna Fly Now (Theme from Rocky)

Listening the Overture has the drawback that you want to listen all 8:43 of it and you miss the garage. Anyway, 4:50 works everytime ie. sends shivers down the spine.

Bill Conti: Overture (Main Rocky Song)

Okey, where's them eggs, I'm going running.
 
Re: Walde's L98

Walde said:
Right. I really should go to garage but I'm feeling lazy. The only thing that is left to correct that is to have some motivational music. For this instance I use music from epic costume drama Rocky Eins und Zwei.

Problem with Gonna Fly Now is that when you plan to go to the garage you get the urge to drink five raw eggs and go running. :shock:

Bill Conti: Gonna Fly Now (Theme from Rocky)

Listening the Overture has the drawback that you want to listen all 8:43 of it and you miss the garage. Anyway, 4:50 works everytime ie. sends shivers down the spine.

Bill Conti: Overture (Main Rocky Song)

Okey, where's them eggs, I'm going running.

Sure enough I had to go run some stair laps and then take a nap!!! :p

 
Re: Walde's L98

Fuel pump

I have no idea how old the installed pump is and as I do not wish to get into possible trouble with it I'd like to replace/upgrade it.

In dyno this 383 made about 460 hp with Performer RPM and 750 carb - we had no possibility to run the engine with EFI.

I have been looking at this Racetronix package: http://www.racetronix.com/RX-C4369-FPKG-2.html

Two items:

Fuel pump with custom installation kit RX-C469-FPA. This has Walbro GSS340M 255L/Hr pump.

C469.jpg


and

Fuel pump harness upgrade system RX-C43-FPWHG-2

C44-FPWH.jpg


This package looks to me as it would have all the necessary parts - maybe even more.

As I have no experience of these do you think these would suit my needs or should I look elsewhere?
 
Back
Top