tumble and swirl, quench & squish


and yeah, watching the videos does help prevent you from having problems,
if you take the info/knowledge you gained,
and use it to your advantage. that requires measuring
1719900963320.png
66962.jpg


66797.jpg


as many members come to know I spend a few hours almost every day adding links, researching, videos and adding detailed comments
or researching, and adding instructions or tips on both new and older existing threads,
one problem this seems to cause is that I frequent go through these component modification threads and realize I may be missing the best current tool, and thus the U.P.S and AMAZON DELIVERY GUYS spend a good deal of time and I tend to spend cash on constant tool upgrades and acquisitions.. and as a tool junkie,this tends to add up over time! my son says Im constantly watching for package deliveries
or as he said, I seem addicted like a heroin junkie, to getting new tools delivered
 
Last edited:

here's a few quick concepts (watch all the way through the video)
the fuel octane level, and how effectively you can evenly mix fuel and air before the piston reaches TDC
and the shape and surface area matters.

combustion chamber temps MATTER, cylinder combustion chamber to piston dome clearance matters
the cooler and more compact and centralized you can keep the fuel/air mix,
in the combustion chamber and the more evenly mixed you can keep that fuel/air mix as its being compressed,
the less likely you'll find the rapid compression in the cylinder initiates self ignition,
minimizing the piston to bore clearance, helps prevent piston rock,in the bore to combustion chamber clearance issues
while vizzard is quoting quench distances used in the 20 thousandth range Id suggest you stay above .035 simply due to having seen lots of evidence of physical piston to head contact on several engines built with mostly OEM parts with quence distances that were less.











 
Last edited:
Back
Top