My Cam Research for the Experts Eye

All the exhaust is now installed, went very smooth with an extra set of hands. Same pics as before, just with all bolts now installed. Good milestone.

Next is to get the cooling system installed. Radiator is in great shape but I've got some refurb to do on the core support. One thing has to step ladder before the next.

Needs clean/repaint and those ss side panels need a run with the scotchbrite pad. Plus the holes for the hoses will be fixed to be true round. All in all not too bad.
6162023164117.jpg

The hardest part right now for me is the heat. Even with open door and fans the garage is like an oven so I'm going slow. 2-3 hours max for me.
 
heats a familiar companion , in texas and florida where I spent and am spending most of my life, and yeah those big fans really help



https://www.tractorsupply.com/tsc/p...nic_feed-_-GoogleShopping-_-Product-_-1308816

Master 42 in. High Capacity Belt-Drive Fan, MAC-42-BDF
SKU: 130881699
1308816

orange-commercial-electric-industrial-fans-bf30ddce-64_1000.jpg
 
Yes, that's what I've got, a lifesaver. Also have a hi velocity 24" with water vapor tubing. So I do what I can out there for as long as I can :cool:, working at my usual Speed of Slow!
 
I took the core support apart for cleaning/repaint. I had rebuilt it years ago so it's pretty straightforward refurbish.

Here's the main pieces, the black ones will get repainted, the u-shape doesn't need re-painting. The general set up supports the radiator and a front bracket holding the transmission cooler.
20230717_124345_HDR_resized.jpg

These are the ss side panels. The cut-outs I did years ago aren't acceptable to me today. I'll clean them up and make the hose openings true round and even up the slots, plus of course clean up the surface.
20230717_124539_HDR_resized.jpg
20230717_124527_HDR_resized.jpg

As a general reference, here's what it all looked like before I took it all apart. Will look pretty much the same when I'm done except no more red/blue AN fittings.
20200714_133641_HDR_resized.jpg
 
Thanks Rick :thumbsup:

Ok - I've got a spark plug question.

This is a 454 block with 3935401 68-76 open chamber large oval port truck 427 heads. Chambers have been cleaned and polished a bit but nothing radical, just a general cleanup.
I always used Delco R45XLS plugs in it without any real issues, but I recall in the last couple of years I drove it there was a slight detonation at times. Plugs generally looked slightly dark brown but no soot or black on them. These are the washer type plugs, not tapered seat.

Block wasn't decked, same (domed) pistons, same .020" deck height. One difference is that previous head gasket was .042" installed thickness, the new head gasket is .039" installed thickness.

Maybe overthinking it, but wondering if moving to a 44 (cooler) plug may be of benefit and also not sure if I should stick with the extended reach or go with a standard plug. My concern is that the "xls" plugs may be into the chamber a bit too much (hotspot) and if the .003" decrease in head gasket thickness may be an issue. I have not rotated the engine with an old xls spark plug installed. I don't recall offhand but there was good piston to valve clearance, and its been rotated dozens of times as it sits. I've kept the oil system primed and I rotate the engine as I do that.

Based on the build info now, any recommendations?
 
I plugged in the new gasket info into the calculator, results below. I'm OK with a very similar DCR. But I do have a much closer deck clearance of .040", where yours is about .060". The highest octane gas I can purchase locally is 91, what about you?

How did you install the cam? In my simulations I have IVC = 69°.

The closer the spark plug to the center of the chamber the better, less time to a complete burn vs being compressed by the piston until it self combusts or detonation.

1689808028879.png
 
I plugged in the new gasket info into the calculator, results below. I'm OK with a very similar DCR. But I do have a much closer deck clearance of .040", where yours is about .060". The highest octane gas I can purchase locally is 91, what about you?

How did you install the cam? In my simulations I have IVC = 69°.

The closer the spark plug to the center of the chamber the better, less time to a complete burn vs being compressed by the piston until it self combusts or detonation.

View attachment 17957

Thanks Rick,

I looked back at my records and I ended up installing the cam 2 degrees retarded.
Here's the reason why - in the chart below, I found that this setting yielded the closest results to specs when I degreed the cam. I repeated the cam degree process several times to ensure I hadn't messed up.
Cam specs are to the left on the chart and degreeing results are on the right.
1689815203287.png

If I plug in current head gasket and cam install data into the spreadsheet:

1689815290480.png

This results in:
1689816212610.png

We have both 91 and 93 octane around here, 93 octane is actually a bit more common.
Something that I'll do tomorrow is install one of the old plugs and rotate the engine - I don't anticipate any problem with the xls plug but better to do this now.
I appreciate your help, especially with sharing these calculators. Makes for great referencing.
 

Attachments

  • 1689815420910.png
    1689815420910.png
    37.7 KB · Views: 1
 
Last edited:
Thanks Grumpy, all are on my read list.
Just a few things that come to mind -

I won't be using the usual (hot air) open element air cleaner - 57's have an air intake above the headlights, feeds into the car. On my car the air feeds from right headlight also to a 4in round duct that originally attached to the heater core. No more heater core but I'll fabricate a closed air cleaner that uses outside cool air from that duct.

Last build I had tried a number of advance curves, used excel to plot the numbers in a graph. I'll do the same this time, makes it very objective to compare and figure out optimum curve.

Quench/squish is now set on the engine, but since it can be calculated, I can factor in other parameters like carb adjust, timing, etc as step by step vs. guessing at everything.

Right now the first step for me is starting this thing and to get the initial spark plug choice settled. I'm ok to get another set if needed after the car is actually driven.

As always, I read and think about/apply advice!
 
Maybe overthinking it, but wondering if moving to a 44 (cooler) plug may be of benefit
If you are thinking that a cooler plug will help with detonation, then this is not going to work. The plug never gets to a temperature that will ignite the fuel/air mixture.
 



you want a controlled burn (that generally takes 30-50 thousands of a second)
where a rapid increase in pressure above the piston forces it down the cylinder,
and you want to avoid detonation, that will rapidly damage a piston
A spark plug only functions completely when its center electrode temperature is between these temperatures of about 500°C and 950°C.
keep in mind just rapidly compressing the fuel/air mix rapidly raised the mixtures temperature enough that it can cause it to self ignite
(detonation) one reason you use quench & squish in the combustion chamber design to get the ignition to start and burn uniformly, and ideally starting in the near center of the combustion chamber and racing out toward the outer edges rather than self ignition near the edges that will rapidly result in piston damage from excessive pressure and heat.
remember at 850 rpm (idle speed ) your compressing a new cylinder full of fuel/air , 7 times a second at 6000 rpm it is 50 times a second.

heatrange_img_02.png

The following examples detail the typical temperatures of various combustion-related engine parts during normal operation:

  • Intake valve: 475° F
  • Exhaust valve: 1,200° F
  • Spark plug: 1,100° F
  • Piston face: 575° F
  • Cylinder wall: 375° F
heatrange_img_03.png

"The most commonly known flammable liquid is gasoline.
It has a flash point of about −50° F (−65° C). The ignition temperature is about 495° F (232(232° C) [sic], a comparatively low figure."
The temperature of the burning gases inside the combustion chamber is typically around 2,800° F. In a diesel engine, this temperature remains fairly steady. In a gasoline-powered engine, the temperature can climb to 4,500° F or more under certain circumstances. However, the vehicle's engine cooling system keeps the walls of the combustion chamber at a temperature of between 265° F and 475° F.






 
Last edited:
Cylinder-Pressure-Lrg.gif

fe008cfd.gif


\ keep in mind its pressurized oil flowing between the moving parts ,that is critical to engine durability, as that , oil flow, absorbs the heat and lubricates the parts and transports the heat , consider the fact that nearly 65% of the fuels energy is dissipated as heat generated not mechanical movement, or power to the rear wheels.
oil flow heat is transferred to the block where coolant flow absorbs and transfers the heat to the radiator to disperse to outside air flow
this is a reason adding a decent high quality oil cooler on a performance engine has huge benefits.



 
Last edited:
Both of you are a terrific help, I appreciate it.
Looking at the info, I'm going to get the same delco r45xls plugs.
But you've also started me thinking about an oil cooler too! This engine can use all the cooling it can.
First I'll get the engine running, then easy enough to modify as needed for something like what you linked to:

I really like that one, anyway, that's a bit later after I research coolers, sandwich plates etc.
 
before you spend cash that might be better spent else ware on an oil cooler it would be smart to verify your engines oil temps
(and trans fluid temps) an oil or trans fluid cooler is a great idea for most performance engines,
as is a 7-8 quart baffled oil pan,
but on some cars its not needed.(accurate gauges help here)
every choice you make is a compromise in some area
 
Last edited:
Thanks Grumpy.
Pan is 7 qt baffled Milodon and I use an external large cooler for the TH400.
Oil cooler would be a later install and if I went ahead with it, I'd use a thermostat controlled adapter at the oil filter to control oil temp.
 
I was taking another look at the numbers you posted and had a question.

- Why would the duration @ .050 change just because you installed the cam with a different advance/retard????
- Did you record the the Intake/Exhaust centerlines for +4 and -2 installations???

Just to be clear, when you say "Installed at 0 degrees", this should say "Dot-to-Dot". It's actually
(114° - 105.5°) / 2 = 4.25° Advanced

Probably when you say +4° Advanced, then it's actually +8 advanced, but I can't easily tell without the centerlines. It could be caluculated from the your valve timing numbers.

1689962346366.png
 
I'm trying to think back on this one - and I'm a bit confused too. Hopefully you can help walk me through....

On the duration @ .050, I recorded where the degree wheel landed at each of the different cam settings and compared to the spec data. I honestly didn't think about durations changing, but assumed that the numbers would adjust as the cam was shifted to the different install settings.

I'll go back to see if I recorded the centerline data, I may not have as I was focused on the open/close valve events.

Yes the "0" degree setting was indeed dot to dot (installed "straight up"). I'll change that on the chart for clarity. The +4 degree call out was based on the corresponding mark on the crank gear, so I called it as installed at +4 degrees. But I see what you say about the centerlines. I've heard before that many cams are ground at +4 degrees as the straight-up install setting? I'll look back on my notes but I don't think Straub/Clay Smith did this on this cam. I hope this isn't a can of worms but better to figure it out .

Crank gear below, as you can see it's marked at the keyway and where the corresponding tooth would be pointing up to the cam gear dot. In the pic below the cam would be installed at that dot to dot position.
20220305_111958_HDR_resized.jpg
20220305_101316_HDR_resized.jpg

Clarifications are appreciated, thanks.

Edit - here's what I got back from C. Straub when I sent him the same degree chart we're discussing. I asked for input on what I had come up with.
"Unless this block has had the lifter bores blueprinted, the best you can do is get the IVO as close to the printed IVO as you can. Being a little retarded is fine as the chain tends to stretch some."
The lobes we use for these are not symmetrical, so a quick centerline method can give a false reading. Small changes in the lifter angle in the bore, and even lifter bore angle itself can effect some of these readings as well.

So I took this as my final setting of -2 degrees was ok.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top